Diabetes research and clinical practice · 2021
Therapeutic effect of continuous diffusion of oxygen therapy combined with traditional moist wound dressing therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
He Shumin, Liang Caiyi, Yi Cailan, Wu Miaoli
Аннотация
AIMS: To investigate the therapeutic effect of continuous diffusion of oxygen (CDO) combined with traditional moist wound dressing (MWD) on the diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) inpatients.
METHODS: The inpatients from May 2016 to April 2018 were enrolled and randomly divided into MWD, CDO and combination treatment groups (n = 40 each group). The moist dressing was used in the MWD group while a micro-oxygen supply device was used in the CDO group. The combination treatment group was given both MWD and CDO. All patients were treated for 8 weeks. The wound healing, amputation rate, and inflammatory control were evaluated.
RESULTS: Compared with MWD and CDO groups, the combination group showed a higher wound healing rate (P < 0.05), lower white blood cell count (P < 0.05) and lower high-sensitivity C-reactive protein level (P < 0.05). During 1-year follow-up, the amputation rate was 0% in combination group, which was significantly lower than that in other two groups (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The combination of MWD and CDO was effective in promoting healing and preventing infection of DFUs, which holds a potential to be a new strategy for the treatment of this critical clinical condition.
METHODS: The inpatients from May 2016 to April 2018 were enrolled and randomly divided into MWD, CDO and combination treatment groups (n = 40 each group). The moist dressing was used in the MWD group while a micro-oxygen supply device was used in the CDO group. The combination treatment group was given both MWD and CDO. All patients were treated for 8 weeks. The wound healing, amputation rate, and inflammatory control were evaluated.
RESULTS: Compared with MWD and CDO groups, the combination group showed a higher wound healing rate (P < 0.05), lower white blood cell count (P < 0.05) and lower high-sensitivity C-reactive protein level (P < 0.05). During 1-year follow-up, the amputation rate was 0% in combination group, which was significantly lower than that in other two groups (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The combination of MWD and CDO was effective in promoting healing and preventing infection of DFUs, which holds a potential to be a new strategy for the treatment of this critical clinical condition.