Ocular immunology and inflammation · 2017
Immunostaining of Immunoglobulin G4 in the Lacrimal Sac.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Takahashi Yasuhiro, Ikeda Hiroshi, Takahashi Emiko, Kakizaki Hirohiko
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To immunohistochemically examine the lacrimal sac walls harvested during dacryocystorhinostomy using an immunostain for immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4).
METHODS: Forty-four lacrimal sac walls were evaluated. We determined "intensively positive," "sparsely positive," or "negative" staining when the specimens showed IgG4-positive lymphoplasmacytic staining with or without >50 IgG4-positive cells/high-power field, or the absence of stained IgG4-positive cells.
RESULTS: Intensively positive, sparsely positive, or negative staining was observed in 8 (18.2%), 14 (31.8%), and 22 specimens (50.0%), respectively. Stained cells infiltrated the subepithelial layer in all specimens with positive staining. Four of the 8 specimens demonstrated partial epithelial denudation with loss of goblet cells.
CONCLUSIONS: IgG4-positive lymphoplasmacytic infiltration was observed in the subepithelial layer in specimens with intensively positive staining, of which some showed a partially denuded epithelium with loss of goblet cells. These may lead to narrowing of the lacrimal sac lumen and adhesions of the sac walls.
METHODS: Forty-four lacrimal sac walls were evaluated. We determined "intensively positive," "sparsely positive," or "negative" staining when the specimens showed IgG4-positive lymphoplasmacytic staining with or without >50 IgG4-positive cells/high-power field, or the absence of stained IgG4-positive cells.
RESULTS: Intensively positive, sparsely positive, or negative staining was observed in 8 (18.2%), 14 (31.8%), and 22 specimens (50.0%), respectively. Stained cells infiltrated the subepithelial layer in all specimens with positive staining. Four of the 8 specimens demonstrated partial epithelial denudation with loss of goblet cells.
CONCLUSIONS: IgG4-positive lymphoplasmacytic infiltration was observed in the subepithelial layer in specimens with intensively positive staining, of which some showed a partially denuded epithelium with loss of goblet cells. These may lead to narrowing of the lacrimal sac lumen and adhesions of the sac walls.