Frontiers in physiology · 2026
Offset loading in hexagonal bar deadlift: a 'stealth' strategy for acutely modulating neuromuscular activation asymmetry and enhancing acute jump performance.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chen Shuwei, Yang Sen, Zhang Xiubing, Ye Jiahui, Feng Shanxin, Huang Wenbai, Liang Weibao
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Traditional bilateral training often masks functional imbalances, potentially reinforcing dominance in the stronger limb. This study investigated the acute effects of minor offset loading (2.5% and 5% of 1RM) during the hexagonal bar deadlift (HBD) on neuromuscular activation patterns and subsequent power performance, aiming to explore its efficacy in acutely modulating bilateral activation asymmetry.
METHODS: Twelve resistance-trained male athletes with right-side dominance participated in a randomized crossover design. Participants performed HBDs under five conditions: Symmetric, and Offset loading (Left/Right) at 2.5% and 5% intensities. Surface electromyography (sEMG) was recorded from the Erector Spinae (ES), External Oblique (EO), Gluteus Maximus (GM), and Rectus Femoris (RF) bilaterally. Vertical jump height (CMJ) and Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) were assessed immediately post-exercise.
RESULTS: Baseline data under the Symmetric condition revealed a neuromuscular activation asymmetry, with significantly higher activation in the dominant (Right) RF and ES (p < 0.05). Offset loading elicited a robust, linear dose-response shift in neuromuscular drive (R 2 > 0.95). Specifically, shifting 5% of the load to the non-dominant (Left) side shifted the Rectus Femoris Asymmetry Index from -3.85% (Right-biased) to +7.41% (Left-biased), with all participants (100%) showing increased agonist recruitment. The External Oblique displayed an inverse activation pattern, confirming a contralateral stabilizing mechanism. Crucially, while RPE increased with offset magnitude (p < 0.001), loading the non-dominant side significantly potentiated CMJ height by 8.2% (p < 0.001), whereas dominant-side loading yielded no significant power gain.
CONCLUSION: Minor offset loading acts as a "stealth" stimulus that effectively overrides the body's default recruitment patterns. By acutely increasing neural drive to the weaker limb and engaging contralateral core stabilizers, non-dominant side offset loading not only acutely shifts the activation bias but also unlocks greater post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) than traditional symmetric loading. These findings provide a quantitative framework for integrating offset HBD into strength and rehabilitation programs to resolve imbalances without inducing excessive fatigue.
METHODS: Twelve resistance-trained male athletes with right-side dominance participated in a randomized crossover design. Participants performed HBDs under five conditions: Symmetric, and Offset loading (Left/Right) at 2.5% and 5% intensities. Surface electromyography (sEMG) was recorded from the Erector Spinae (ES), External Oblique (EO), Gluteus Maximus (GM), and Rectus Femoris (RF) bilaterally. Vertical jump height (CMJ) and Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) were assessed immediately post-exercise.
RESULTS: Baseline data under the Symmetric condition revealed a neuromuscular activation asymmetry, with significantly higher activation in the dominant (Right) RF and ES (p < 0.05). Offset loading elicited a robust, linear dose-response shift in neuromuscular drive (R 2 > 0.95). Specifically, shifting 5% of the load to the non-dominant (Left) side shifted the Rectus Femoris Asymmetry Index from -3.85% (Right-biased) to +7.41% (Left-biased), with all participants (100%) showing increased agonist recruitment. The External Oblique displayed an inverse activation pattern, confirming a contralateral stabilizing mechanism. Crucially, while RPE increased with offset magnitude (p < 0.001), loading the non-dominant side significantly potentiated CMJ height by 8.2% (p < 0.001), whereas dominant-side loading yielded no significant power gain.
CONCLUSION: Minor offset loading acts as a "stealth" stimulus that effectively overrides the body's default recruitment patterns. By acutely increasing neural drive to the weaker limb and engaging contralateral core stabilizers, non-dominant side offset loading not only acutely shifts the activation bias but also unlocks greater post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) than traditional symmetric loading. These findings provide a quantitative framework for integrating offset HBD into strength and rehabilitation programs to resolve imbalances without inducing excessive fatigue.