MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/09546634.2020.1771259

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of dermatological treatment · 2021

A split face comparative study between intradermal tranexamic acid and Erbium-YAG laser in treatment of melasma.

Otb Sarah, Shaarawy Eman, Sadek Ahmad, Abdallah Noha, Agamia Naglaa, Soliman Mona, Tawfik Abeer Attia

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Although there are different treatment modalities of melasma, it remains a challenging problem. Erbium-YAG laser proved its efficacy in melasma improvement with minimal downtime. Tranexamic acid (TA) is a new promising treatment of melasma.

OBJECTIVE

The first objective is to compare between the efficacy of intradermal injection of TA and Erbium-YAG laser in the treatment of melasma. The second objective is to use the dermoscope as an objective evaluation method.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

A split face study was conducted on 28 patients. One side of the face received intradermal TA injection. The other side was treated with laser. Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) and the dermoscope were used for evaluation of treatment.

RESULTS

The MASI scores showed a significant decrease in TA treated side. The dermoscope assessment showed no significant difference in both treatment modalities.

CONCLUSION

A promising results were obtained by both intradermal TA and Erbium:YAG laser; however, the TA yields a higher patient satisfaction because of its high efficiency and low cost.

Для цитирования: Otb Sarah, Shaarawy Eman, Sadek Ahmad, Abdallah Noha, Agamia Naglaa, Soliman Mona, Tawfik Abeer Attia. A split face comparative study between intradermal tranexamic acid and Erbium-YAG laser in treatment of melasma.. The Journal of dermatological treatment. 2021. DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2020.1771259.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.