The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 1996
Correlation of protein levels with skin prick test reactions in patients allergic to latex.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Beezhold D, Pugh B, Liss G, Sussman G
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Natural rubber latex (NRL) gloves are the major source of proteins that cause latex allergic reactions in sensitized health care workers and patients.
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the effect of manufacturing changes on reducing protein, antigen, and allergen levels of latex medical gloves.
METHODS: Three types of NRL gloves were manufactured with a common batch of compounded latex. The NRL gloves were analyzed for total protein by using the American Society for Testing and Materials D5712-95 Lowry method, and specifically for latex proteins by immunoassay. Allergen levels in the extracts were determined by end-point titration skin prick tests (SPTs) on patients allergic to NRL.
RESULTS: Extracts from regular powdered gloves had detectable levels of latex proteins and allergens (62% SPT positive), whereas the powder-free gloves were low in protein content and allergenicity (5% to 8% SPT positive). No significant difference in SPT reactivity was observed between the chlorinated powder-free gloves and the polymer-coated gloves. Although the protein levels determined by the Lowry assay correlated with SPT reactivity (r = 0.95), the test was restricted by a high detection limit (9.3 micrograms/ml). Fifty-eight percent of patients allergic to latex reacted at the 50 micrograms/gm detection limit allowed by the Food and Drug Administration. The ELISA had a good correlation with SPT reactivity (r = 0.93), and because of the greater sensitivity, gloves testing below the ELISA reporting limit (0.06 microgram/ml) have a significantly lower potential for eliciting reactions in patients allergic to latex.
CONCLUSIONS: Results of protein assays are acceptable criteria with which to rate the potential allergenicity of gloves; however, the American Society for Testing and Materials D5712-95 assay may lack the sensitivity to provide clinically relevant data.
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the effect of manufacturing changes on reducing protein, antigen, and allergen levels of latex medical gloves.
METHODS: Three types of NRL gloves were manufactured with a common batch of compounded latex. The NRL gloves were analyzed for total protein by using the American Society for Testing and Materials D5712-95 Lowry method, and specifically for latex proteins by immunoassay. Allergen levels in the extracts were determined by end-point titration skin prick tests (SPTs) on patients allergic to NRL.
RESULTS: Extracts from regular powdered gloves had detectable levels of latex proteins and allergens (62% SPT positive), whereas the powder-free gloves were low in protein content and allergenicity (5% to 8% SPT positive). No significant difference in SPT reactivity was observed between the chlorinated powder-free gloves and the polymer-coated gloves. Although the protein levels determined by the Lowry assay correlated with SPT reactivity (r = 0.95), the test was restricted by a high detection limit (9.3 micrograms/ml). Fifty-eight percent of patients allergic to latex reacted at the 50 micrograms/gm detection limit allowed by the Food and Drug Administration. The ELISA had a good correlation with SPT reactivity (r = 0.93), and because of the greater sensitivity, gloves testing below the ELISA reporting limit (0.06 microgram/ml) have a significantly lower potential for eliciting reactions in patients allergic to latex.
CONCLUSIONS: Results of protein assays are acceptable criteria with which to rate the potential allergenicity of gloves; however, the American Society for Testing and Materials D5712-95 assay may lack the sensitivity to provide clinically relevant data.