Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology · 1996
Immediate hypersensitivity to human recombinant granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor associated with a positive prick skin test reaction.
Клинический случайСтатьяПоддержка правительства СШАПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Engler R J, Weiss R B
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rhu GM-CSF), also known as sargramostim, is used to accelerate myeloid recovery following bone marrow transplantation or cytotoxic chemotherapy. "Anaphylactic" reactions to sargramostim have been reported on a limited basis and are poorly characterized.
OBJECTIVE: It is the purpose of this report to describe an adverse reaction to sargramostim treatment involving palmar itching, urticaria, angioedema, and throat tightness and to demonstrate the utility of prick skin testing to determine type I sensitization.
METHODS: Prick skin testing with 100 and 250 micrograms/mL sargramostim and 300 micrograms/mL rhu G-CSF (filgrastim) was performed in the patient and four control subjects.
RESULTS: The patient experienced an immediate wheal and flare reaction with both concentrations of sargramostim while the control subjects demonstrated no reaction. There was also no reaction with filgrastim (rhu G-CSF) in either group and the patient subsequently tolerated filgrastim therapy.
CONCLUSION: Prick skin testing with rhu GM-CSF and rhu G-CSF may be useful to demonstrate type I sensitization. Additional studies are needed to determine the incidence and prevalence of skin test reactions in larger numbers of patients with cytokine therapy exposure.
OBJECTIVE: It is the purpose of this report to describe an adverse reaction to sargramostim treatment involving palmar itching, urticaria, angioedema, and throat tightness and to demonstrate the utility of prick skin testing to determine type I sensitization.
METHODS: Prick skin testing with 100 and 250 micrograms/mL sargramostim and 300 micrograms/mL rhu G-CSF (filgrastim) was performed in the patient and four control subjects.
RESULTS: The patient experienced an immediate wheal and flare reaction with both concentrations of sargramostim while the control subjects demonstrated no reaction. There was also no reaction with filgrastim (rhu G-CSF) in either group and the patient subsequently tolerated filgrastim therapy.
CONCLUSION: Prick skin testing with rhu GM-CSF and rhu G-CSF may be useful to demonstrate type I sensitization. Additional studies are needed to determine the incidence and prevalence of skin test reactions in larger numbers of patients with cytokine therapy exposure.