IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2025
Improved Dual-Task Interference in Parkinson's Disease Following Deep Brain Stimulation.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ghislieri Marco, Locoratolo Lorenzo, Sciscenti Fabrizio, Knaflitz Marco, Rizzi Laura, Armocida Daniele, Lanotte Michele, Agostini Valentina
Аннотация
This work aims to evaluate how Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) impacts the motor-cognitive dual-task performance of Parkinson's Disease (PD) patients. We analyzed the muscle synergies of 27 PD patients at T0 (pre-surgery), T1(3 months post-surgery), and T2 (12 months post-surgery), compared to a control group of 30 age-matched individuals, during a walking task and a motor-cognitive dual task (walking while performing a phonemic fluency task). To evaluate dual-task interference, the Dual Task Effect (DTE) of both motor and cognitive metrics was analyzed. Our findings demonstrate that DBS significantly enhances dual-task capacity, with PD patients transitioning from a detrimental "posture-second" strategy at T0 to a more efficient attentional allocation pattern post-surgery. More specifically, the average motor metric mDTEFWHM (DTE of the Full-Width-at-Half-Maximum of the muscle synergy activation coefficients) of PD patients changed from ${}{{-}}\text {}$ 12.5 $~\pm ~$ 11.5 % (T0 to ${}{{-}}\text {}$ 3.7 $~\pm ~$ 10.2 % (T1 and ${}{{-}}\text {}$ 4.5 $~\pm ~$ 8 % (T2, becoming not different from that of controls ( ${}{{-}}\text {}$ 1.1 $~\pm ~$ 12.7 %). On the other hand, the PD cognitive DTE (cDTE) at T0 was ${}{{-}}\text {}$ 12.4 $~\pm ~$ 23.2 %, not significantly different from that of controls ( ${}{{-}}\text {}$ 23.0 $~\pm ~$ 21.0 %), and remained unchanged 1 year after the DBS implant (T2: ${}{{-}}\text {}$ 11.2 $~\pm ~$ 25.9). The reduced impact of cognitive loading on motor function without compromising cognitive performance suggests enhanced attentional resource management of PD patients after DBS that may translate to improved dynamic balance and reduced fall risk in daily activities.