m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Journal of neurointerventional surgery · 2026

Intra-procedural SSEP latency stratifies functional outcome after successful endovascular thrombectomy.

СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Lee Su Ji, Lee Joonwon, Kim Sung-Tae, Kim Su Pin, Jin Sung-Chul, Cho Minjae

Аннотация

BACKGROUND: Successful angiographic reperfusion during endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) does not reliably predict 90-day functional recovery. Whether intra-procedural somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) latency dynamics stratify outcome among patients achieving successful recanalization remains unevaluated.

METHODS: In this exploratory sub-study nested within the prospective COMPETE trial, consecutive anterior large-vessel occlusion patients with modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) ≥2b underwent intra-procedural SSEP monitoring. Three sequential Classification and Regression Tree analyses used N20-derived variables (primary; n=84), P40-derived variables (secondary; n=71), and combined N20/P40 variables (tertiary; n=56). Bootstrap resampling (n=1000) assessed variable selection stability. Favorable outcome was modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2 at 90 days.

RESULTS: Across all three analyses, latency variables consistently outranked amplitude. In the primary analysis, Max ΔN20 Latency was the dominant root discriminator (bootstrap selection ~90%; cut-off 2.25 ms, 95% CI 0.85 to 4.65 ms; Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC-ROC) 0.746, 95% CI 0.644 to 0.848), with favorable outcome rising from 26% to 77% across terminal classes (P<0.001). In the secondary analysis, Max P40 Latency was the strongest discriminator (bootstrap selection ~93%; cut-off 49 ms, 95% CI 47.40 to 54.70 ms; AUC 0.887, 95% CI 0.814 to 0.959), stratifying favorable outcome as 90% vs 35% (P<0.001). In the tertiary combined analysis, Max P40 Latency was the primary split and Max ΔN20 Latency the secondary; favorable outcome ranged from 27% to 93% (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION: Among patients achieving successful angiographic reperfusion, intra-procedural SSEP latency dynamics were associated with stratified 90-day functional outcome with bootstrap-supported reproducibility. These findings suggest that intra-procedural SSEP latency may serve as a candidate real-time physiologic indicator during EVT, warranting prospective external validation.

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты