Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2026
Use of the Restorative Value Score (RVS) in the Planning and Implementation of a Comprehensive Multidisciplinary Treatment Plan.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
González-Martín Oscar, Veltri Mario, Su Huan, Sanz Mariano, Belser Urs C
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Comprehensive rehabilitation for multifactorial dental disease requires coordinated planning across restorative/prosthodontic, periodontal, endodontic, and orthodontic disciplines. Existing tooth-level prognostic tools typically focus on single domains and therefore offer limited guidance for interdisciplinary decision-making or for communicating expected effort and cost.
OVERVIEW: This paper proposes the Restorative Value Score (RVS), an objective 0-5 tooth-level index that summarizes, in one number, the amount and complexity of care needed to return a tooth to predictable function and esthetics within a comprehensive plan (with 0 indicating no treatment and 5 indicating extraction). The intermediate categories reflect the breadth of disciplinary involvement and the requirement for more advanced interventions. These interventions are linked to greater time, cost and procedural risk. The RVS is intended to complement-rather than replace-patient-level risk assessment, and should be interpreted in light of systemic, behavioral, and socioeconomic determinants, clinician expertise, and adherence to supportive care. This paper outline the construct and scoring logic, offer guidance for implementation, and propose prospective validation to assess discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility relative to existing tooth- and implant-based alternatives.
CONCLUSION: By making effort and complexity explicit at the tooth level, the RVS seeks to reduce unwarranted variability, improve predictability and cost-effectiveness, and furnish a common language for clinicians, educators, and patients engaged in multidisciplinary dental care.
OVERVIEW: This paper proposes the Restorative Value Score (RVS), an objective 0-5 tooth-level index that summarizes, in one number, the amount and complexity of care needed to return a tooth to predictable function and esthetics within a comprehensive plan (with 0 indicating no treatment and 5 indicating extraction). The intermediate categories reflect the breadth of disciplinary involvement and the requirement for more advanced interventions. These interventions are linked to greater time, cost and procedural risk. The RVS is intended to complement-rather than replace-patient-level risk assessment, and should be interpreted in light of systemic, behavioral, and socioeconomic determinants, clinician expertise, and adherence to supportive care. This paper outline the construct and scoring logic, offer guidance for implementation, and propose prospective validation to assess discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility relative to existing tooth- and implant-based alternatives.
CONCLUSION: By making effort and complexity explicit at the tooth level, the RVS seeks to reduce unwarranted variability, improve predictability and cost-effectiveness, and furnish a common language for clinicians, educators, and patients engaged in multidisciplinary dental care.