DOI 10.1007/s11547-025-02152-2
Feasibility study on QSM and R2* mapping for quantitative evaluation of iron deposition and ovarian function assessment in endometriotic ovarian cysts.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the feasibility of quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) and R2* mapping in assessing iron deposition in endometriotic ovarian cysts (EMO) and their potential implications for ovarian reserve.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
This prospective study included 28 patients (33 lesions) with histopathologically confirmed EMO who underwent preoperative MRI examinations, including R2* mapping and QSM. Cyst fluid iron concentration ([Fe]) was measured via inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry. Serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels were quantified as a marker of ovarian reserve. Pearson correlation and regression analyses were performed to assess associations among AMH, [Fe], R2*, and QSM values.
RESULTS
In Group All Ages, AMH was negatively correlated with age (r = -0.74, p < 0.001) and [Fe] (r = -0.35, p = 0.048), while [Fe] showed moderate positive correlations with R2* (r = 0.55, p < 0.001) and QSM (r = 0.56, p < 0.001). In Group < 40 years, AMH exhibited moderate negative correlations with [Fe] (r = -0.45, p = 0.031), R2* (r = -0.48, p = 0.019), QSM (r = -0.49, p = 0.018). Multiple regression analyses confirmed that [Fe], R2*, QSM were significant predictors of AMH levels (p < 0.05). R2* and QSM were highly correlated (r = 0.72, p < 0.001), validating their consistency in assessing iron content.
CONCLUSION
R2* mapping and QSM reliably quantify iron deposition in EMO, with in vitro validation supporting their accuracy. Moreover, the potential link between iron deposition and ovarian reserve highlights the preliminary value of these methods in assessing ovarian function.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.