American journal of surgery · 2011
Randomized clinical trial of vessel sealing system (LigaSure) in esophagogastric devascularization and splenectomy in patients with portal hypertension.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yao Hou Shan, Wang Wei Jun, Wang Qiang, Gao Wen Chao, Xiang Hong Gang, Hu Zhi Qian, Gao Jia Dong, Chen Xue Yun, Wang Wei Min
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The LigaSure vessel sealing system (Valleylab, Boulder, CO) has been tested, with excellent results, in different fields of surgery. However, no study has evaluated the efficiency of the LigaSure in open esophagogastric decongestion and splenectomy in a randomized trial to date.
METHODS: Patients scheduled to undergo esophagogastric decongestion and splenectomy were assigned to the use of either the LigaSure or a conventional clamp-and-tie technique. Primary outcome measures were operating time and intraoperative blood loss. Secondary outcome measures were postoperative drainage volume, complications such as spleen fever, bleeding, portal vein thrombosis, length of incision, pain, and time to discharge.
RESULTS: Sixty patients were randomized to the LigaSure (n = 30) and clamp-and-tie (n = 30) groups. The groups were well matched with respect to liver function, associated illnesses, and grading of esophageal varices. Postoperative outcomes in drainage and major complications did not differ between the groups, while operative time and the volume of blood loss were significantly decreased in the LigaSure group compared with the clamp-and-tie group (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: The use of the LigaSure is safe and effective in vessel division and homeostasis in the esophagogastric decongestion and splenectomy, with statistically significant decreases in operative time and intraoperative blood loss and without significantly modifying postoperative results.
METHODS: Patients scheduled to undergo esophagogastric decongestion and splenectomy were assigned to the use of either the LigaSure or a conventional clamp-and-tie technique. Primary outcome measures were operating time and intraoperative blood loss. Secondary outcome measures were postoperative drainage volume, complications such as spleen fever, bleeding, portal vein thrombosis, length of incision, pain, and time to discharge.
RESULTS: Sixty patients were randomized to the LigaSure (n = 30) and clamp-and-tie (n = 30) groups. The groups were well matched with respect to liver function, associated illnesses, and grading of esophageal varices. Postoperative outcomes in drainage and major complications did not differ between the groups, while operative time and the volume of blood loss were significantly decreased in the LigaSure group compared with the clamp-and-tie group (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: The use of the LigaSure is safe and effective in vessel division and homeostasis in the esophagogastric decongestion and splenectomy, with statistically significant decreases in operative time and intraoperative blood loss and without significantly modifying postoperative results.