Medical ultrasonography · 2011
The value of contrast enhanced ultrasound in the evaluation of the nature of portal vein thrombosis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dănilă Mirela, Sporea Ioan, Popescu Alina, Sirli Roxana, Sendroiu Mădălina
Аннотация
UNLABELLED: Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a relatively common complication in patients with liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, but might also occur in the absence of liver disease. Ultrasound (US) is the first imaging method used for assessing PVT.
THE PURPOSE: To evaluate the utility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for the differentiation between benign and malignant PVT.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: from October 2009 to October 2010, 38 PVTs were evaluated by means of ultrasound (standard, Doppler and CEUS). 29 PVT were in patients with liver cirrhosis and 9 in subjects without liver cirrhosis.
RESULTS: 15 of 38 patients (39.5%) had benign PVT and 23 patients (60.5%) had malignant PVT. Results of CEUS examination were conclusive in 37/38 (97.2%) of the examinations for PVT, allowing the differentiation between benign and malignant thrombosis. When the result was inconclusive, another imaging method was performed (MRI).
CONCLUSION: CEUS is a very good method for the evaluation of benign or malignant nature of portal vein thrombosis.
THE PURPOSE: To evaluate the utility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for the differentiation between benign and malignant PVT.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: from October 2009 to October 2010, 38 PVTs were evaluated by means of ultrasound (standard, Doppler and CEUS). 29 PVT were in patients with liver cirrhosis and 9 in subjects without liver cirrhosis.
RESULTS: 15 of 38 patients (39.5%) had benign PVT and 23 patients (60.5%) had malignant PVT. Results of CEUS examination were conclusive in 37/38 (97.2%) of the examinations for PVT, allowing the differentiation between benign and malignant thrombosis. When the result was inconclusive, another imaging method was performed (MRI).
CONCLUSION: CEUS is a very good method for the evaluation of benign or malignant nature of portal vein thrombosis.