Eating behaviors · 2001
Abstention during cue reactivity assessment is associated with better outcome among women with bulimia nervosa.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Carter F A, McIntosh V V, Joyce P R, Bulik C M
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To compare women with bulimia nervosa who abstained from eating during pretreatment cue reactivity assessment with those who ate.
METHOD: 135 participants in a randomized clinical trial completed an assessment of cue reactivity to individualized high-risk binge foods prior to treatment. A broad range of physiological, self-report, and behavioral measures of cue reactivity was assessed. Primary, secondary, and tertiary outcome measures of eating disorder symptomatology were evaluated at pretreatment, midtreatment, posttreatment, and 6-month follow-up.
RESULTS: As expected, women who abstained from eating during pretreatment cue reactivity assessment exhibited less cue reactivity than women who ate. This was especially evident for self-report measures of cue reactivity. Surprisingly, women who abstained from eating during pretreatment cue reactivity assessment also had significantly less eating disorder symptomatology at 6-month follow-up.
DISCUSSION: Possible psychological mechanisms contributing to the superior outcome of women who abstained from eating during the cue reactivity assessment and implications for the assessment of cue reactivity are discussed.
METHOD: 135 participants in a randomized clinical trial completed an assessment of cue reactivity to individualized high-risk binge foods prior to treatment. A broad range of physiological, self-report, and behavioral measures of cue reactivity was assessed. Primary, secondary, and tertiary outcome measures of eating disorder symptomatology were evaluated at pretreatment, midtreatment, posttreatment, and 6-month follow-up.
RESULTS: As expected, women who abstained from eating during pretreatment cue reactivity assessment exhibited less cue reactivity than women who ate. This was especially evident for self-report measures of cue reactivity. Surprisingly, women who abstained from eating during pretreatment cue reactivity assessment also had significantly less eating disorder symptomatology at 6-month follow-up.
DISCUSSION: Possible psychological mechanisms contributing to the superior outcome of women who abstained from eating during the cue reactivity assessment and implications for the assessment of cue reactivity are discussed.