MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-70772-x

Медицинская библиотека · Scientific reports · 2020

Attachment styles modulate neural markers of threat and imagery when engaging in self-criticism.

Kim Jeffrey J, Kent Kirsty M, Cunnington Ross, Gilbert Paul, Kirby James N

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Attachment styles hold important downstream consequences for mental health through their contribution to the emergence of self-criticism. To date, no work has extended our understanding of the influence of attachment styles on self-criticism at a neurobiological level. Herein we investigate the relationship between self-reported attachment styles and neural markers of self-criticism using fMRI. A correlation network analysis revealed lingual gyrus activation during self-criticism, a marker of visual mental imagery, correlated with amygdala activity (threat response). It also identified that secure attachment positively correlated with lingual gyrus activation, whilst avoidant attachment was negatively correlated with lingual gyrus activation. Further, at greater levels of amygdala response, more securely attached individuals showed greater lingual gyrus activation, and more avoidantly attached individuals showed less lingual gyrus activation. Our data provide the first evidence that attachment mechanisms may modulate threat responses and mental imagery when engaging in self-criticism, which have important clinical and broader social implications.

Для цитирования: Kim Jeffrey J, Kent Kirsty M, Cunnington Ross, Gilbert Paul, Kirby James N. Attachment styles modulate neural markers of threat and imagery when engaging in self-criticism.. Scientific reports. 2020. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-70772-x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.