MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/bjc.12139

Медицинская библиотека · The British journal of clinical psychology · 2017

Distress, omnipotence, and responsibility beliefs in command hallucinations.

Ellett Lyn, Luzon Olga, Birchwood Max, Abbas Zarina, Harris Abi, Chadwick Paul

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

Command hallucinations are considered to be one of the most distressing and disturbing symptoms of schizophrenia. Building on earlier studies, we compare key attributes in the symptomatic, affective, and cognitive profiles of people diagnosed with schizophrenia and hearing voices that do (n = 77) or do not (n = 74) give commands.

METHODS

The study employed a cross-sectional design, in which we assessed voice severity, distress and control (PSYRATs), anxiety and depression (HADS), beliefs about voices (BAVQ-R), and responsibility beliefs (RIQ). Clinical and demographic variables were also collected.

RESULTS

Command hallucinations were found to be more distressing and controlling, perceived as more omnipotent and malevolent, linked to higher anxiety and depression, and resisted more than hallucinations without commands. Commanding voices were also associated with higher conviction ratings for being personally responsible for preventing harm.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest key differences in the affective and cognitive profiles of people who hear commanding voices, which have important implications for theory and psychological interventions.

PRACTITIONER POINTS: Command hallucinations are associated with higher distress, malevolence, and omnipotence. Command hallucinations are associated with higher responsibility beliefs for preventing harm. Responsibility beliefs are associated with voice-related distress. Future psychological interventions for command hallucinations might benefit from focussing not only on omnipotence, but also on responsibility beliefs, as is done in psychological therapies for obsessive compulsive disorder. Limitations The cross-sectional design does not assess issues of causality. We did not measure the presence or severity of delusions.

Для цитирования: Ellett Lyn, Luzon Olga, Birchwood Max, Abbas Zarina, Harris Abi, Chadwick Paul. Distress, omnipotence, and responsibility beliefs in command hallucinations.. The British journal of clinical psychology. 2017. DOI: 10.1111/bjc.12139.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.