MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5302

Медицинская библиотека · JAMA internal medicine · 2014

Primary care-based buprenorphine taper vs maintenance therapy for prescription opioid dependence: a randomized clinical trial.

Fiellin David A, Schottenfeld Richard S, Cutter Christopher J, Moore Brent A, Barry Declan T, O'Connor Patrick G

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

IMPORTANCE

Prescription opioid dependence is increasing and creates a significant public health burden, but primary care physicians lack evidence-based guidelines to decide between tapering doses followed by discontinuation of buprenorphine hydrochloride and naloxone hydrochloride therapy (hereinafter referred to as buprenorphine therapy) or ongoing maintenance therapy.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy of buprenorphine taper vs ongoing maintenance therapy in primary care-based treatment for prescription opioid dependence.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND

PARTICIPANTS

We conducted a 14-week randomized clinical trial that enrolled 113 patients with prescription opioid dependence from February 17, 2009, through February 1, 2013, in a single primary care site.

INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to buprenorphine taper (taper condition) or ongoing buprenorphine maintenance therapy (maintenance condition). The buprenorphine taper was initiated after 6 weeks of stabilization, lasted for 3 weeks, and included medications for opioid withdrawal, after which patients were offered naltrexone treatment. The maintenance group received ongoing buprenorphine therapy. All patients received physician and nurse support and drug counseling.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Illicit opioid use via results of urinanalysis and patient report, treatment retention, and reinitiation of buprenorphine therapy (taper group only).

RESULTS

During the trial, the mean percentage of urine samples negative for opioids was lower for patients in the taper group (35.2% [95% CI, 26.2%-44.2%]) compared with those in the maintenance group (53.2% [95% CI, 44.3%-62.0%]). Patients in the taper group reported more days per week of illicit opioid use than those in the maintenance group once they were no longer receiving buprenorphine (mean use, 1.27 [95% CI, 0.60-1.94] vs 0.47 [95% CI, 0.19-0.74] days). Patients in the taper group had fewer maximum consecutive weeks of opioid abstinence compared with those in the maintenance group (mean abstinence, 2.70 [95% CI, 1.72-3.75] vs 5.20 [95% CI, 4.16-6.20] weeks). Patients in the taper group were less likely to complete the trial (6 of 57 [11%] vs 37 of 56 [66%]; P < .001). Sixteen patients in the taper group reinitiated buprenorphine treatment after the taper owing to relapse.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Tapering is less efficacious than ongoing maintenance treatment in patients with prescription opioid dependence who receive buprenorphine therapy in primary care.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00555425.

Для цитирования: Fiellin David A, Schottenfeld Richard S, Cutter Christopher J, Moore Brent A, Barry Declan T, O'Connor Patrick G. Primary care-based buprenorphine taper vs maintenance therapy for prescription opioid dependence: a randomized clinical trial.. JAMA internal medicine. 2014. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5302.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.