Annals of surgical oncology · 2021
Extended En Bloc Reoperation for Recurrent or Persistent Parathyroid Carcinoma: Analysis of 31 Cases in a Single Institute Experience.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wei Bojun, Zhao Teng, Shen Hong, Jin Mulan, Zhou Quan, Liu Xing, Wang Jiacheng, Wang Qian
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Parathyroid carcinoma (PC) is a rare malignancy that is difficult to eradicate completely after recurrence. We assessed the efficiency of extended en bloc resection (EEBR) in the management of recurrent or persistent PC.
METHODS: In this observational cohort study, 31 patients who underwent reoperations for recurrent or persistent PC were enrolled after 2-9 surgeries by other medical teams. EEBRs, which provided the oncologic resection by removing all possible tumor-bearing scar tissues, were adopted in 25 patients. The other 6 with gross infiltration into the upper aerodigestive tract (UAT) underwent less radical procedures for unwillingness to sacrifice laryngeal function.
RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate after EEBR was 59.6% compared with 16.7% after less radical procedures, with an improved median expected survival time of 90.0 months compared with 13.0 months after local excision. EEBR exhibited a favorable local control of relapses in 84.0% of patients after a median follow-up period of 27.0 months, 40.0% even achieved disease-free survival, although 56.0% had subsequent distant metastases (DMs) and suffered a worse 5-year OS of 36.7% in contrast with 100.0% in the absence of DM (p = 0.011). UAT invasion, rather than age, number of previous operations, or preoperative PTH levels, was the unique independent factor associated with both DM (HR = 5.466, p = 0.006) and mortality (HR = 7.606, p = 0.011).
CONCLUSION: EEBRs provide better outcomes than other conventional surgical approaches and might offer a second chance of cure for patients with recurrent or persistent PC in the absence of DM.
METHODS: In this observational cohort study, 31 patients who underwent reoperations for recurrent or persistent PC were enrolled after 2-9 surgeries by other medical teams. EEBRs, which provided the oncologic resection by removing all possible tumor-bearing scar tissues, were adopted in 25 patients. The other 6 with gross infiltration into the upper aerodigestive tract (UAT) underwent less radical procedures for unwillingness to sacrifice laryngeal function.
RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate after EEBR was 59.6% compared with 16.7% after less radical procedures, with an improved median expected survival time of 90.0 months compared with 13.0 months after local excision. EEBR exhibited a favorable local control of relapses in 84.0% of patients after a median follow-up period of 27.0 months, 40.0% even achieved disease-free survival, although 56.0% had subsequent distant metastases (DMs) and suffered a worse 5-year OS of 36.7% in contrast with 100.0% in the absence of DM (p = 0.011). UAT invasion, rather than age, number of previous operations, or preoperative PTH levels, was the unique independent factor associated with both DM (HR = 5.466, p = 0.006) and mortality (HR = 7.606, p = 0.011).
CONCLUSION: EEBRs provide better outcomes than other conventional surgical approaches and might offer a second chance of cure for patients with recurrent or persistent PC in the absence of DM.