Surgical endoscopy · 2013
Laparoscopic resection of retrorectal tumors: a feasibility study in 12 consecutive patients.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Duclos Julie, Maggiori Léon, Zappa Magaly, Ferron Marianne, Panis Yves
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Surgical approaches for retrorectal tumors (RRT) are either abdominal, dorsal trans-sacrococcygeal, or perineal. Very few cases have been reported so far concerning a laparoscopic approach. The aim of this study was to assess the results of laparoscopy for the treatment of RRT.
METHODS: All patients who underwent laparoscopy for RRT between 2003 and 2012 were reviewed. Data included patient and tumor characteristics, surgical morbidity, and mortality.
RESULTS: A total of 12 consecutive women with a median age of 55 years underwent laparoscopy for RRT. Median operative time was 145 min (range 70-215). Two conversions in laparotomy occurred, and one patient needed a temporary diverting ileostomy for rectal injury. Postoperatively, two patients presented urinary tract infections. Median length of stay was 8 days (range 4-16). Pathological examinations showed complete resections (R0) for ten benign tumors and one malignant tumor (Ewing sarcoma). One lesion was incompletely resected, a colloid sarcoma (R1 status), and was re-operated on by laparotomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. No local recurrence was observed after a median follow-up of 34 months (range 12-79) for benign lesions, and 28 and 71 months for the two patients who underwent resection of Ewing and colloid sarcoma, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic resection for RRT seems feasible and safe. It allows complete excision of tumors located in the retrorectal space with low morbidity. Thus, this approach can be a valid alternative to standard Kraske or open abdominal approaches for the treatment of RRT.
METHODS: All patients who underwent laparoscopy for RRT between 2003 and 2012 were reviewed. Data included patient and tumor characteristics, surgical morbidity, and mortality.
RESULTS: A total of 12 consecutive women with a median age of 55 years underwent laparoscopy for RRT. Median operative time was 145 min (range 70-215). Two conversions in laparotomy occurred, and one patient needed a temporary diverting ileostomy for rectal injury. Postoperatively, two patients presented urinary tract infections. Median length of stay was 8 days (range 4-16). Pathological examinations showed complete resections (R0) for ten benign tumors and one malignant tumor (Ewing sarcoma). One lesion was incompletely resected, a colloid sarcoma (R1 status), and was re-operated on by laparotomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. No local recurrence was observed after a median follow-up of 34 months (range 12-79) for benign lesions, and 28 and 71 months for the two patients who underwent resection of Ewing and colloid sarcoma, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic resection for RRT seems feasible and safe. It allows complete excision of tumors located in the retrorectal space with low morbidity. Thus, this approach can be a valid alternative to standard Kraske or open abdominal approaches for the treatment of RRT.