Asia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2015
Clinical and Antibacterial Efficacy and Safety of Besifloxacin Ophthalmic Suspension Compared With Moxifloxacin Ophthalmic Solution.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Garg Prashant, Mathur Umang, Sony Parul, Tandon Radhika, Morris Timothy W, Comstock Timothy L
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of besifloxacin ophthalmic suspension 0.6% compared with moxifloxacin ophthalmic solution 0.5% in the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis in an Indian population.
DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized, double-masked, active-controlled, parallel-group, clinical trial, including 6 clinical sites in India.
METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive 1 drop of besifloxacin or moxifloxacin in the infected eye(s), 3 times daily, for 5 days. Primary efficacy end points included clinical resolution and bacterial eradication at day 5. Secondary efficacy end points included clinical resolution and bacterial eradication at day 8, ocular discharge, bulbar conjunctival injection, investigator's global assessment, and bacterial eradication by species. Efficacy was analyzed using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel and Pearson χ2 tests. Safety was assessed by the incidence of ocular and nonocular treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), changes in visual acuity, and biomicroscopy and ophthalmoscopy findings. Data presented are that for the subset of patients from India.
RESULTS: Of the 123 patients randomized at clinical sites in India, 96.7% completed the study. Day 5 differences in microbial eradication (100% besifloxacin vs 96.3% moxifloxacin) and in clinical resolution (78.9% besifloxacin vs 71.4% moxifloxacin) were not statistically significant. No statistically significant between-group differences were observed for secondary end points. All ocular AEs in both groups were mild or moderate in severity. There were no drug-related ocular AEs with besifloxacin.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis with besifloxacin 0.6% produces similar antibacterial and clinical efficacy as that with moxifloxacin 0.5% in an Indian population, with no clinically meaningful safety concerns.
DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized, double-masked, active-controlled, parallel-group, clinical trial, including 6 clinical sites in India.
METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive 1 drop of besifloxacin or moxifloxacin in the infected eye(s), 3 times daily, for 5 days. Primary efficacy end points included clinical resolution and bacterial eradication at day 5. Secondary efficacy end points included clinical resolution and bacterial eradication at day 8, ocular discharge, bulbar conjunctival injection, investigator's global assessment, and bacterial eradication by species. Efficacy was analyzed using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel and Pearson χ2 tests. Safety was assessed by the incidence of ocular and nonocular treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), changes in visual acuity, and biomicroscopy and ophthalmoscopy findings. Data presented are that for the subset of patients from India.
RESULTS: Of the 123 patients randomized at clinical sites in India, 96.7% completed the study. Day 5 differences in microbial eradication (100% besifloxacin vs 96.3% moxifloxacin) and in clinical resolution (78.9% besifloxacin vs 71.4% moxifloxacin) were not statistically significant. No statistically significant between-group differences were observed for secondary end points. All ocular AEs in both groups were mild or moderate in severity. There were no drug-related ocular AEs with besifloxacin.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis with besifloxacin 0.6% produces similar antibacterial and clinical efficacy as that with moxifloxacin 0.5% in an Indian population, with no clinically meaningful safety concerns.