European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology · 2000
Scintimammography enhances negative predictive value of non-invasive pre-operative assessment of breast lesions.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mirzaei S, Zajicek S M, Knoll P, Lipp C, Lipp R W, Salzer H, Umek H, Kohn H
Аннотация
AIMS: The aim of this study was to develop a criterion with a high negative predictive value for the evaluation of breast lesions. We aimed to determine the value of combining three non-invasive tests, mammography (MM), ultrasonography (USS) and 99mTc-methoxyisobutylisonitrite (99mTc-MIBI) scintimammography (scinti-MM).
METHODS: We included 94 consecutive patients with suspected lesions detected by mammography or on physical examination. MM, USS and scinti-MM were performed no more than 4 weeks prior to excisional biopsy in all patients. We then compared the biopsy results with a score calculated for each patient, derived from the results of the three tests, which we termed 'mamma malignancy index' (MMI).
RESULTS: Each of the three exams yielded a score ranging from 0 to 2, with 0 representing an almost certainly benign lesion, 1 an indeterminate finding and 2 a likely malignant lesion, and hence giving a total score ranging from 0 to 6. The biopsy results showed that the lesions in 64 patients were benign. Forty-nine (77%) of these patients had received an MMI score of 0 or 1. The negative predictive value for malignancy in patients with a score less than 2 was 100%.
CONCLUSIONS: Since the smallest detected lesion was 9 mm in diameter, we conclude that MMI may be a highly useful diagnostic tool in the delineation of breast lesions > or =1 cm which should not be routinely referred for biopsy but may be followed non-invasively. Although fine needle aspiration has limitations, we would recommend it as a less invasive method to evaluate suspected lesions smaller than 1 cm.
METHODS: We included 94 consecutive patients with suspected lesions detected by mammography or on physical examination. MM, USS and scinti-MM were performed no more than 4 weeks prior to excisional biopsy in all patients. We then compared the biopsy results with a score calculated for each patient, derived from the results of the three tests, which we termed 'mamma malignancy index' (MMI).
RESULTS: Each of the three exams yielded a score ranging from 0 to 2, with 0 representing an almost certainly benign lesion, 1 an indeterminate finding and 2 a likely malignant lesion, and hence giving a total score ranging from 0 to 6. The biopsy results showed that the lesions in 64 patients were benign. Forty-nine (77%) of these patients had received an MMI score of 0 or 1. The negative predictive value for malignancy in patients with a score less than 2 was 100%.
CONCLUSIONS: Since the smallest detected lesion was 9 mm in diameter, we conclude that MMI may be a highly useful diagnostic tool in the delineation of breast lesions > or =1 cm which should not be routinely referred for biopsy but may be followed non-invasively. Although fine needle aspiration has limitations, we would recommend it as a less invasive method to evaluate suspected lesions smaller than 1 cm.