Journal of pediatric psychology · 2006
Teachers' perceptions of and responses to adolescents with chronic pain syndromes.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Logan Deirdre E, Coakley Rachael M, Scharff Lisa
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To examine factors that influence teachers' perceptions of and responses to chronic pain in students.
METHODS: Two-hundred and sixty classroom teachers responded to a vignette describing a student with limb pain. The 2 x 2 x 2 factorial design included conditions that varied by (a) the presence or absence of documented organic evidence for the pain, (b) cooperative vs. confrontational parent-teacher interactions, and (c) the presence or absence of communication from the medical team. Teachers rated pain severity and impairment, relief from classroom responsibilities, extent of accommodations the student would require in school, and sympathy for the student and family.
RESULTS: Documented medical evidence supporting the pain was the most influential factor affecting teachers' responses to pain. Parental attitude also influenced responses. Communication from the medical team influenced teachers' decisions about relief from responsibilities but did not affect other reactions.
CONCLUSIONS: Teachers' responses to students with pain are influenced by situational factors. Efforts to increase school functioning in youth with chronic pain should incorporate attempts to help teachers respond to pain adaptively.
METHODS: Two-hundred and sixty classroom teachers responded to a vignette describing a student with limb pain. The 2 x 2 x 2 factorial design included conditions that varied by (a) the presence or absence of documented organic evidence for the pain, (b) cooperative vs. confrontational parent-teacher interactions, and (c) the presence or absence of communication from the medical team. Teachers rated pain severity and impairment, relief from classroom responsibilities, extent of accommodations the student would require in school, and sympathy for the student and family.
RESULTS: Documented medical evidence supporting the pain was the most influential factor affecting teachers' responses to pain. Parental attitude also influenced responses. Communication from the medical team influenced teachers' decisions about relief from responsibilities but did not affect other reactions.
CONCLUSIONS: Teachers' responses to students with pain are influenced by situational factors. Efforts to increase school functioning in youth with chronic pain should incorporate attempts to help teachers respond to pain adaptively.