MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/jpepsy/jsj110

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of pediatric psychology · 2006

Teachers' perceptions of and responses to adolescents with chronic pain syndromes.

Logan Deirdre E, Coakley Rachael M, Scharff Lisa

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To examine factors that influence teachers' perceptions of and responses to chronic pain in students.

METHODS

Two-hundred and sixty classroom teachers responded to a vignette describing a student with limb pain. The 2 x 2 x 2 factorial design included conditions that varied by (a) the presence or absence of documented organic evidence for the pain, (b) cooperative vs. confrontational parent-teacher interactions, and (c) the presence or absence of communication from the medical team. Teachers rated pain severity and impairment, relief from classroom responsibilities, extent of accommodations the student would require in school, and sympathy for the student and family.

RESULTS

Documented medical evidence supporting the pain was the most influential factor affecting teachers' responses to pain. Parental attitude also influenced responses. Communication from the medical team influenced teachers' decisions about relief from responsibilities but did not affect other reactions.

CONCLUSIONS

Teachers' responses to students with pain are influenced by situational factors. Efforts to increase school functioning in youth with chronic pain should incorporate attempts to help teachers respond to pain adaptively.

Для цитирования: Logan Deirdre E, Coakley Rachael M, Scharff Lisa. Teachers' perceptions of and responses to adolescents with chronic pain syndromes.. Journal of pediatric psychology. 2006. DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsj110.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.