MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/jamia/ocac188

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022

Evaluation of federated learning variations for COVID-19 diagnosis using chest radiographs from 42 US and European hospitals.

Peng Le, Luo Gaoxiang, Walker Andrew, Zaiman Zachary, Jones Emma K, Gupta Hemant, Kersten Kristopher, Burns John L, Harle Christopher A, Magoc Tanja, Shickel Benjamin, Steenburg Scott D, Loftus Tyler, Melton Genevieve B, Gichoya Judy Wawira, Sun Ju, Tignanelli Christopher J

СтатьяПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Federated learning (FL) allows multiple distributed data holders to collaboratively learn a shared model without data sharing. However, individual health system data are heterogeneous. "Personalized" FL variations have been developed to counter data heterogeneity, but few have been evaluated using real-world healthcare data. The purpose of this study is to investigate the performance of a single-site versus a 3-client federated model using a previously described Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19) diagnostic model. Additionally, to investigate the effect of system heterogeneity, we evaluate the performance of 4 FL variations.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

We leverage a FL healthcare collaborative including data from 5 international healthcare systems (US and Europe) encompassing 42 hospitals. We implemented a COVID-19 computer vision diagnosis system using the Federated Averaging (FedAvg) algorithm implemented on Clara Train SDK 4.0. To study the effect of data heterogeneity, training data was pooled from 3 systems locally and federation was simulated. We compared a centralized/pooled model, versus FedAvg, and 3 personalized FL variations (FedProx, FedBN, and FedAMP).

RESULTS

We observed comparable model performance with respect to internal validation (local model: AUROC 0.94 vs FedAvg: 0.95, P = .5) and improved model generalizability with the FedAvg model (P < .05). When investigating the effects of model heterogeneity, we observed poor performance with FedAvg on internal validation as compared to personalized FL algorithms. FedAvg did have improved generalizability compared to personalized FL algorithms. On average, FedBN had the best rank performance on internal and external validation.

CONCLUSION

FedAvg can significantly improve the generalization of the model compared to other personalization FL algorithms; however, at the cost of poor internal validity. Personalized FL may offer an opportunity to develop both internal and externally validated algorithms.

Для цитирования: Peng Le, Luo Gaoxiang, Walker Andrew, Zaiman Zachary, Jones Emma K, Gupta Hemant, Kersten Kristopher, Burns John L, Harle Christopher A, Magoc Tanja, Shickel Benjamin, Steenburg Scott D, Loftus Tyler, Melton Genevieve B, Gichoya Judy Wawira, Sun Ju, Tignanelli Christopher J. Evaluation of federated learning variations for COVID-19 diagnosis using chest radiographs from 42 US and European hospitals.. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA. 2022. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocac188.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.