Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2020
Impact of paced left ventricular dyssynchrony on left ventricular reverse remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gauthey Anaïs, Willemen Erik, Lumens Joost, Ploux Sylvain, Bordachar Pierre, Ritter Philippe, Prinzen Frits W, Lejeune Sibille, Pouleur Anne-Catherine, Garnir Quentin, Marchandise Sébastien, Scavée Christophe, Wauters Aurélien, le Polain de Waroux Jean-Benoit
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: We investigated whether pacing-induced electrical dyssynchrony at the time of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device implantation was associated with chronic CRT response.
METHODS AND RESULTS: We included a total of 69 consecutive heart failure patients who received a CRT device. Left (LVp-RVs) and right (RVp-LVs) pacing-induced interlead delays were measured intraoperatively and used to determine if there was paced left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony, defined as present when LVp-RVs is larger than RVp-LVs. CRT response was defined as a reduction in LV end-systolic volume ≥15%, 6 months after implantation. Paced left ventricular dyssynchrony (PLVD) was associated with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) (χ2 : 8; P = .005) but not with QRS morphology nor with pacing lead positions. In a univariate analysis, PLVD (odds ratio [OR], 6.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2-18.9; P = .001), atypical left bundle branch block (LBBB) (OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.2-9.4; P = .022), and ICM (OR, 5.2; 95% CI, 1.6-17; P = .006) were associated with nonresponse. In a multivariate analysis, both PLVD (OR, 9.74; 95% CI, 2.8-33.9; P < .0001) and atypical LBBB (OR, 5.6; 95% CI, 1.5-20.3; P = .009) were independently associated with nonresponse. Adding PLVD to a model based on QRS morphology provided a significant and meaningful incremental value to predict LV reverse remodeling after CRT (χ2 to enter: 8; P < .005). Computer simulations corroborate these findings by showing that, while intrinsic electrical dyssynchrony is a prerequisite, the level of pacing-induced dyssynchrony modulates acute CRT response.
CONCLUSION: In addition to the intrinsic electrical substrate, PLVD is strongly associated with less LV reverse remodeling, demonstrating that measuring the electrical substrate during pacing has additional value for prediction of CRT response in an already well-selected patient population.
METHODS AND RESULTS: We included a total of 69 consecutive heart failure patients who received a CRT device. Left (LVp-RVs) and right (RVp-LVs) pacing-induced interlead delays were measured intraoperatively and used to determine if there was paced left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony, defined as present when LVp-RVs is larger than RVp-LVs. CRT response was defined as a reduction in LV end-systolic volume ≥15%, 6 months after implantation. Paced left ventricular dyssynchrony (PLVD) was associated with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) (χ2 : 8; P = .005) but not with QRS morphology nor with pacing lead positions. In a univariate analysis, PLVD (odds ratio [OR], 6.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2-18.9; P = .001), atypical left bundle branch block (LBBB) (OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.2-9.4; P = .022), and ICM (OR, 5.2; 95% CI, 1.6-17; P = .006) were associated with nonresponse. In a multivariate analysis, both PLVD (OR, 9.74; 95% CI, 2.8-33.9; P < .0001) and atypical LBBB (OR, 5.6; 95% CI, 1.5-20.3; P = .009) were independently associated with nonresponse. Adding PLVD to a model based on QRS morphology provided a significant and meaningful incremental value to predict LV reverse remodeling after CRT (χ2 to enter: 8; P < .005). Computer simulations corroborate these findings by showing that, while intrinsic electrical dyssynchrony is a prerequisite, the level of pacing-induced dyssynchrony modulates acute CRT response.
CONCLUSION: In addition to the intrinsic electrical substrate, PLVD is strongly associated with less LV reverse remodeling, demonstrating that measuring the electrical substrate during pacing has additional value for prediction of CRT response in an already well-selected patient population.