Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2019
A novel risk model for very late return of atrial fibrillation beyond 1 year after cryoballoon ablation: the SCALE-CryoAF score.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Peigh Graham, Kaplan Rachel M, Bavishi Aakash, Diaz Celso L, Baman Jayson R, Matiasz Richard, Trivedi Amar, Sattayaprasert Prasongchai, Wasserlauf Jeremiah, Shen Mark J, Potpara Tatjana S, Chicos Alexandru B, Arora Rishi, Kim Susan, Lin Albert, Verma Nishant, Knight Bradley P, Passman Rod S
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Cryoballoon ablation (CBA) is an effective technique for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). To date, there are no risk models to predict very late recurrence of atrial fibrillation (VLRAF) after CBA.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a single-center database was performed. Inclusion criteria included PVI using CBA for atrial fibrillation (AF) without additional ablation targets, follow-up > 365 days, and no recurrent AF between 90 and 365 days after procedure. The primary endpoint was recurrent AF > 30 s > 12 months post-CBA. A risk model was created using clinical variables.
RESULTS: Of 674 CBA performed from 2011 to 2016, 300 patients (200 male, 62.0 ± 9.9 years) met inclusion criteria. Of these, 159 (53.0%) patients had paroxysmal AF. Patients had an average of 9.5 ± 2.7 cryoballoon freezes, and no patients required additional radiofrequency ablation lesion sets. Over a follow-up of 995 ± 490 days, 77/300 (25.7%) patients exhibited VLRAF. Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that Structural heart disease (1 point), Coronary artery disease (3 points), left Atrial diameter > 43 mm (1 point), Left bundle branch block (3 points), Early return of AF (4 points), and non-paroxysmal AF (3 points) were risk factors for VLRAF. Combining these variables into a risk model, SCALE-CryoAF, (min 0; max 15) predicted VLRAF with an area under the curve of 0.73.
CONCLUSION: SCALE-CryoAF is the first risk model to specifically predict first recurrence of AF beyond 1 year, VLRAF, after CBA. Model discrimination demonstrates that SCALE-CryoAF predicts VLRAF after CBA significantly better than other risk models for AF recurrence.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a single-center database was performed. Inclusion criteria included PVI using CBA for atrial fibrillation (AF) without additional ablation targets, follow-up > 365 days, and no recurrent AF between 90 and 365 days after procedure. The primary endpoint was recurrent AF > 30 s > 12 months post-CBA. A risk model was created using clinical variables.
RESULTS: Of 674 CBA performed from 2011 to 2016, 300 patients (200 male, 62.0 ± 9.9 years) met inclusion criteria. Of these, 159 (53.0%) patients had paroxysmal AF. Patients had an average of 9.5 ± 2.7 cryoballoon freezes, and no patients required additional radiofrequency ablation lesion sets. Over a follow-up of 995 ± 490 days, 77/300 (25.7%) patients exhibited VLRAF. Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that Structural heart disease (1 point), Coronary artery disease (3 points), left Atrial diameter > 43 mm (1 point), Left bundle branch block (3 points), Early return of AF (4 points), and non-paroxysmal AF (3 points) were risk factors for VLRAF. Combining these variables into a risk model, SCALE-CryoAF, (min 0; max 15) predicted VLRAF with an area under the curve of 0.73.
CONCLUSION: SCALE-CryoAF is the first risk model to specifically predict first recurrence of AF beyond 1 year, VLRAF, after CBA. Model discrimination demonstrates that SCALE-CryoAF predicts VLRAF after CBA significantly better than other risk models for AF recurrence.