MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/lgt.0b013e3181d73622

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of lower genital tract disease · 2010

A retrospective study of 95 women with a clinical diagnosis of genital lichen planus.

Santegoets Lindy A M, Helmerhorst Theo J M, van der Meijden Willem I

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this retrospective clinical study was to evaluate clinical features, histopathology, treatment regimen, and follow-up in 95 patients with genital lichen planus.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data of 95 women diagnosed with genital lichen planus and visiting the vulvar clinic at Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

RESULTS

All patients were symptomatic, most often complaining of vulvar soreness and burning (31.6%). Of all women, 34% had persistent symptoms for more than 5 years. On physical examination, 81.1% showed sharply demarcated erythematous lesions, usually located at the vestibule, and 56.8% had oral lesions. Treatment usually consisted of potent topical corticosteroids. Seventeen women (17.9%) were referred to the gynecology department for additional surgical treatment. In two of them, a vulvar squamous cell carcinoma was detected, followed by radical surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

In cases with vulvar soreness and burning, sharply demarcated erythematous vulvar lesions, and the concomitant presence of oral lesions, the diagnosis of lichen planus should be considered and treatment must be initiated accordingly, even when histopathology is discordant.

Для цитирования: Santegoets Lindy A M, Helmerhorst Theo J M, van der Meijden Willem I. A retrospective study of 95 women with a clinical diagnosis of genital lichen planus.. Journal of lower genital tract disease. 2010. DOI: 10.1097/lgt.0b013e3181d73622.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.