Archives of craniofacial surgery · 2026
Transnasal balloon-assisted posterior ridge restoration for inferior orbital wall fractures.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kim Sungyeon, Jeon Hong Bae, Kim Hyonsurk, Kang Dong Hee
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of primary bone restoration with transnasal balloon-assisted support for inferior orbital wall fractures and compared it with the efficacy of conventional alloplastic reconstruction.
METHODS: A total of 85 patients were included in this study. Of them, 25 underwent transconjunctival reconstruction with alloplastic implants (Group A), whereas the remaining 60 underwent primary bone reduction with transnasal balloon-assisted support (Group B). Postoperative outcomes were evaluated based on Hertel exophthalmometry, the orbital volume ratio (OVR) calculated from 6-month follow-up computed tomography (CT) scans, and a curvature analysis of the posterior orbital floor contour on sagittal CT images.
RESULTS: Both groups showed significant postoperative improvements in OVR (from 109.23% to 103.07% in Group A; from 111.17% to 103.27% in Group B; p< 0.001). The mean change in the Hertel scale was -0.20 mm in Group A and -0.43 mm in Group B, with no statistically significant difference between the groups (p> 0.05). No significant difference was observed in the magnitude of volume reduction between Groups A (6.16%) and B (7.90%; p= 0.296). Curvature analysis demonstrated a significantly smaller absolute curvature difference between the operated and contralateral sides in Group B than in Group A (0.0136 vs. 0.0310; p< 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Transnasal balloon-assisted primary bone restoration represents a reliable surgical alternative, facilitating the reconstruction of natural orbital floor contours while minimizing complications associated with conventional alloplastic implants.
METHODS: A total of 85 patients were included in this study. Of them, 25 underwent transconjunctival reconstruction with alloplastic implants (Group A), whereas the remaining 60 underwent primary bone reduction with transnasal balloon-assisted support (Group B). Postoperative outcomes were evaluated based on Hertel exophthalmometry, the orbital volume ratio (OVR) calculated from 6-month follow-up computed tomography (CT) scans, and a curvature analysis of the posterior orbital floor contour on sagittal CT images.
RESULTS: Both groups showed significant postoperative improvements in OVR (from 109.23% to 103.07% in Group A; from 111.17% to 103.27% in Group B; p< 0.001). The mean change in the Hertel scale was -0.20 mm in Group A and -0.43 mm in Group B, with no statistically significant difference between the groups (p> 0.05). No significant difference was observed in the magnitude of volume reduction between Groups A (6.16%) and B (7.90%; p= 0.296). Curvature analysis demonstrated a significantly smaller absolute curvature difference between the operated and contralateral sides in Group B than in Group A (0.0136 vs. 0.0310; p< 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Transnasal balloon-assisted primary bone restoration represents a reliable surgical alternative, facilitating the reconstruction of natural orbital floor contours while minimizing complications associated with conventional alloplastic implants.