MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/00016350903136605

Медицинская библиотека · Acta odontologica Scandinavica · 2009

Oral lichen planus and chronic junctional stomatitis: differences in lymphocyte subpopulations.

Omar A Ahmed Haji, Hietanen Jarkko, Kero Mia, Lukinmaa Pirjo-Liisa, Hagström Jaana

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Oral lichen planus (OLP) is an oral counterpart or oral manifestation of the common skin disease lichen planus. Chronic junctional stomatitis (CJS) is a relatively unknown condition characterized by a stromal lymphocyte infiltrate, which is also a diagnostic feature of OLP. The differential diagnosis of OLP and CJS is unclear and they have been suggested to represent variants of the same disease.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

To investigate possible differences in lymphocyte (sub)populations between these two conditions, we immunostained 10 OLP and 10 CJS specimens for CD1-a, and the lymphocyte markers, CD3, CD4, CD5, CD8, and CD20. We scored the staining results by a four-step grading system and used the Fisher exact test to analyze them statistically.

RESULTS

The proportional amount of (CD20 positive) B lymphocytes was higher in CJS than in OLP and the predominance of CD4 positive T lymphocytes over CD8 positive T lymphocytes was stronger in OLP than in CJS. The differences were statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

The results reflect differences in the lymphatic infiltrate between OLP and CJS. Their significance needs further investigation.

Для цитирования: Omar A Ahmed Haji, Hietanen Jarkko, Kero Mia, Lukinmaa Pirjo-Liisa, Hagström Jaana. Oral lichen planus and chronic junctional stomatitis: differences in lymphocyte subpopulations.. Acta odontologica Scandinavica. 2009. DOI: 10.1080/00016350903136605.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.