Journal of patient safety · 2020
Factors Influencing Time-Dependent Quality Indicators for Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
France Daniel J, Levin Scott, Ding Ru, Hemphill Robin, Han Jin, Russ Stephan, Aronsky Dominik, Weinger Matt
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Rapid risk stratification and timely treatment are critical to favorable outcomes for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Our objective was to identify patient and system factors that influence time-dependent quality indicators (QIs) for patients with unstable angina/non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) in the emergency department (ED).
METHODS: A retrospective, cohort study was conducted during a 42-month period of all patients 24 years or older suspected of having ACS as defined by receiving an electrocardiogram and at least 1 cardiac biomarker test. Cox regression was used to model the effects of patient characteristics, ancillary service use, staffing provisions, equipment availability, and ED and hospital crowding on ACS QIs.
RESULTS: Emergency department adherence rates to national standards for electrocardiogram readout time and biomarker turnaround time were 42% and 37%, respectively. Cox regression models revealed that chief complaints without chest pain and the timing of stress testing and medication administration were associated with the most significant delays.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient and system factors both significantly influenced QI times in this cohort with unstable angina/NSTEMI. These results illustrate both the complexity of diagnosing patients with NSTEMI and the competing effects of clinical and system factors on patient flow through the ED.
METHODS: A retrospective, cohort study was conducted during a 42-month period of all patients 24 years or older suspected of having ACS as defined by receiving an electrocardiogram and at least 1 cardiac biomarker test. Cox regression was used to model the effects of patient characteristics, ancillary service use, staffing provisions, equipment availability, and ED and hospital crowding on ACS QIs.
RESULTS: Emergency department adherence rates to national standards for electrocardiogram readout time and biomarker turnaround time were 42% and 37%, respectively. Cox regression models revealed that chief complaints without chest pain and the timing of stress testing and medication administration were associated with the most significant delays.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient and system factors both significantly influenced QI times in this cohort with unstable angina/NSTEMI. These results illustrate both the complexity of diagnosing patients with NSTEMI and the competing effects of clinical and system factors on patient flow through the ED.