Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie · 1998
[Surgical therapy of choledocholithiasis].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Köckerling F, Scheuerlein H, Schneider C, Hohenberger W
Аннотация
Following the introduction of endoscopic papillotomy and stone extraction, surgical bile duct revision has decreased considerably in importance during the past two decades. Surgical bile duct revision is associated with an appreciably higher rate of complications than endoscopic stone extraction. The result has been that most working groups now favour a "therapeutic splitting" approach. This means that, wherever possible, endoscopic revision of the bile duct is first attempted. If, during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, intraoperative cholangiography reveals the presence of bile duct stones, they may, after consultation with the endoscopist, be left in place for removal by endoscopic papillotomy at some later date. Only in the case of very young patients and exceptionally, a highly experienced laparoscopic surgeon may attempt a transcystic extraction of such stones. Continuing indications for conventional surgical treatment of choledocholithiasis are local factors obstructing access to the papilla (gastrectomy, stenosis of the pylorus) and other bile duct changes requiring correction (choledochocele, strictures, stenoses, Mirizzi's syndrome, over-looked impacted stone obstructing an over-long cystic duct stump, intrahepatic lithiasis).