Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2023
Lessons learned from the first national population-based genetic carrier-screening program for Duchenne muscular dystrophy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Singer Amihood, Aartsma-Rus Annemieke, Grinshpun-Cohen Julia, Sagi-Dain Lena
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To summarize the results of first year implementation of pan-ethnic screening testing for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) and present the ensuing challenges.
METHODS: Data acquisition for this study was performed by retrospective search of Ministry of Health registry for reports of all laboratories performing genetic screening tests. DMD testing was performed by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification technology. In case of single-exon deletion, sequencing of the specific exon was performed to rule out underlying single-nucleotide variant.
RESULTS: Of overall 85,737 DMD tests, 82 clinically significant findings were noted (0.095%, or 1:1,046 women). In addition, 80 findings with uncertain clinical significance were detected (0.093%, or 1:1072), as well as 373 cases (0.4%, or 1:230) of single-exon deletions subsequently identified as false positives because of underlying single-nucleotide variant, mostly variants in exon 8 in North African Jewish population, and in exon 48 in Arab Muslim population.
CONCLUSION: Interpretation of population-based DMD carrier screening is complex, occasionally requiring additional genetic testing methods and ethical considerations. Multicenter data registry, including ethnic origin and familial segregation in selected cases, is crucial for optimal definition of the results during genetic counseling and informed decisions regarding prenatal testing.
METHODS: Data acquisition for this study was performed by retrospective search of Ministry of Health registry for reports of all laboratories performing genetic screening tests. DMD testing was performed by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification technology. In case of single-exon deletion, sequencing of the specific exon was performed to rule out underlying single-nucleotide variant.
RESULTS: Of overall 85,737 DMD tests, 82 clinically significant findings were noted (0.095%, or 1:1,046 women). In addition, 80 findings with uncertain clinical significance were detected (0.093%, or 1:1072), as well as 373 cases (0.4%, or 1:230) of single-exon deletions subsequently identified as false positives because of underlying single-nucleotide variant, mostly variants in exon 8 in North African Jewish population, and in exon 48 in Arab Muslim population.
CONCLUSION: Interpretation of population-based DMD carrier screening is complex, occasionally requiring additional genetic testing methods and ethical considerations. Multicenter data registry, including ethnic origin and familial segregation in selected cases, is crucial for optimal definition of the results during genetic counseling and informed decisions regarding prenatal testing.