Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2023
Comparison of Aerosol Emissions during Specific Speech Tasks.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
van Mersbergen Miriam, Marchetta Jeffrey, Foti Daniel, Pillow Eric, Dasgupta Apratim, Cain Chandler, Morvant Stephen
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Recent investigations into the behavior of aerosolized emissions from the oral cavity have shown that particulate emissions do indeed occur during speech. To date, there is little information about the relative contribution of different speech sounds in producing particle emissions in a free field. This study compares airborne aerosol generation in participants producing isolated speech sounds: fricative consonants, plosive consonants, and vowel sounds.
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, reversal experimental design, where each participant served as their own control and all participants were exposed to all stimuli.
METHODS: While participants produced isolated speech tasks, a planar beam of laser light, a high-speed camera, and image software calculated the number of particulates detected over time. This study compared airborne aerosols emitted by human participants at a distance of 2.54 cm between the laser sheet and the mouth.
RESULTS: Statistically significant increases in particulate count over ambient dust distribution for all speech sounds. When collapsed across loudness levels, emitted particles in vowel sounds were statistically greater than consonants, suggesting that mouth opening, as opposed to the place of vocal tract constriction or manner of sound production, might also be influential in the degree to which particulates become aerosolized during speech.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this research will inform boundary conditions for computational models of aerosolized particulates during speech.
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, reversal experimental design, where each participant served as their own control and all participants were exposed to all stimuli.
METHODS: While participants produced isolated speech tasks, a planar beam of laser light, a high-speed camera, and image software calculated the number of particulates detected over time. This study compared airborne aerosols emitted by human participants at a distance of 2.54 cm between the laser sheet and the mouth.
RESULTS: Statistically significant increases in particulate count over ambient dust distribution for all speech sounds. When collapsed across loudness levels, emitted particles in vowel sounds were statistically greater than consonants, suggesting that mouth opening, as opposed to the place of vocal tract constriction or manner of sound production, might also be influential in the degree to which particulates become aerosolized during speech.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this research will inform boundary conditions for computational models of aerosolized particulates during speech.