[A comparative analysis of quality of life between surgical and interventional treatment in patients with complex coronary heart disease].

Objective: To compare the improvement of quality of life in the patients with left main coronary artery disease and multi-vessel disease between off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within one year after revascularization. Methods: This study was a prospective study. Between January and July 2018, 840 patients with complex coronary heart disease accepted revascularization therapy, 420 of whom underwent OPCABG and 420 for PCI, with a mean age of 61 years and a male rate of 74% (622/840). European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) were employed to assess the quality of life and health status of patients. Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was used to adjust treatment selection bias. Results: All-cause mortality (3.6% vs 1.3%, P=0.045), major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) (11.3% vs 4.1%, P<0.001) and target lesion revascularization (8.3% vs 1.2%, P<0.001) were higher in PCI group than those in OPCABG group. EQ-5D scores in PCI group were significantly higher than those in OPCABG group at 1 month after operation (P<0.001), but there was no significant difference between the two groups at 12 months after operation (P=0.210). In SAQ scale, the frequency score of angina pectoris in OPCABG group was higher than that in PCI group in 1 month, 6 months and 12 months after operation (all P<0.05). The physical activity limitation score in PCI group was significantly higher than that in OPCABG group at one month after operation (P<0.01). There was no significant difference between OPCABG group and PCI group in terms of stable state of angina pectoris, satisfaction of treatment and the knowledge of disease. Conclusions: In the short term, the quality of life of patients with left main coronary artery disease and multi-vessel disease treated with OPCABG is better than PCI. However, the improvement of quality of life in the medium and long term still needs to be identified in future follow-up study.