Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025
Fast and Accurate Abdominal PDFF and R2* Mapping With Model-Fitted Flip Angle Modulation and Simultaneous Multi-Slice (SMS) 2D Imaging.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cheng Chuanli, Wan Liwen, Peng Hao, Wan Qian, Liu Xin, Liang Dong, Zheng Hairong, Zou Chao
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To establish and validate an online model fitting-based flip angle calculation method for flip angle modulated (FAM) chemical shift-encoded (CSE) MRI integrated with simultaneous multi-slice (SMS) imaging for achieving fast and accurate abdominal proton-density fat fraction (PDFF) and R2* quantification.
METHODS: Gaussian functions were fitted to directly determine optimal FA profiles, thereby avoiding computationally intensive iterative optimization. Inter-slice SMS acceleration was incorporated to improve acquisition efficiency. Fat-water phantom and volunteer with varying liver fat deposition were scanned at 3.0 T to validate the accuracy of PDFF and R2* quantification across different PE steps with different acceleration methods by inter-slice SMS (FAM-SMS), in-plane GRAPPA (FAM-GRAPPA), and combination of SMS and GRAPPA (FAM-Hybrid), using low-FA 3D acquisitions as reference. Relative noise level (rNL) was defined to evaluate the acquisition efficiency.
RESULTS: In the phantom study (PDFF: 6.2%-35.7%; R2*: 29.2-154.3 s-1), the model-fitted FA profiles closely matched optimized profiles, showing unbiased PDFF and R2* (p > 0.05). FAM-SMS showed high correlation with 3D reference (PDFF: 0.994-0.995, R2*: 0.978-0.988). In vivo study, FAM-SMS achieved comparable noise levels to 3D acquisition (PDFF: 0.9%-28.7%; R2*: 32.7-85.4 s-1), demonstrating 18.7% lower PDFF SD and 18.5% lower R2* SD compared to FAM-GRAPPA (p < 0.05). Despite higher SD, FAM-Hybrid reduced rNL by 8.0% (PDFF) and 17.0% (R2*) versus FAM-GRAPPA.
CONCLUSION: The proposed 2D FAM method with model-fitted FA calculation and SMS acceleration provides fast, accurate, and motion-robust liver PDFF and R2* imaging, with superior noise performance to GRAPPA, enabling simplified protocol design.
METHODS: Gaussian functions were fitted to directly determine optimal FA profiles, thereby avoiding computationally intensive iterative optimization. Inter-slice SMS acceleration was incorporated to improve acquisition efficiency. Fat-water phantom and volunteer with varying liver fat deposition were scanned at 3.0 T to validate the accuracy of PDFF and R2* quantification across different PE steps with different acceleration methods by inter-slice SMS (FAM-SMS), in-plane GRAPPA (FAM-GRAPPA), and combination of SMS and GRAPPA (FAM-Hybrid), using low-FA 3D acquisitions as reference. Relative noise level (rNL) was defined to evaluate the acquisition efficiency.
RESULTS: In the phantom study (PDFF: 6.2%-35.7%; R2*: 29.2-154.3 s-1), the model-fitted FA profiles closely matched optimized profiles, showing unbiased PDFF and R2* (p > 0.05). FAM-SMS showed high correlation with 3D reference (PDFF: 0.994-0.995, R2*: 0.978-0.988). In vivo study, FAM-SMS achieved comparable noise levels to 3D acquisition (PDFF: 0.9%-28.7%; R2*: 32.7-85.4 s-1), demonstrating 18.7% lower PDFF SD and 18.5% lower R2* SD compared to FAM-GRAPPA (p < 0.05). Despite higher SD, FAM-Hybrid reduced rNL by 8.0% (PDFF) and 17.0% (R2*) versus FAM-GRAPPA.
CONCLUSION: The proposed 2D FAM method with model-fitted FA calculation and SMS acceleration provides fast, accurate, and motion-robust liver PDFF and R2* imaging, with superior noise performance to GRAPPA, enabling simplified protocol design.