m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Annales francaises d'anesthesie et de reanimation · 1995

[In which patients and for which procedures has the efficacy of postoperative artificial nutrition be proven?].

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Blanloeil Y

Аннотация

This study reviewed 19 prospective studies for the incidence of postoperative nutritional support on outcome in elective surgery. It compared enteral and parenteral nutrition initiated no more than three days preoperatively or postoperatively and prolonged maximally for one month, to a simple infusion of glucose or saline. As all studies had methodological weaknesses, concerning mainly the sample size, it is impossible to propose relevant recommendations. Nevertheless, among the 11 studies on total parenteral nutritional support (nitrogen and caloric supply with carbohydrates and/or lipids), three of them produced valuable results. As the available data do not show any beneficial effect, a routine postoperative nutritional support cannot be recommended, even in patients at high risk of postoperative complications. However for the latter a possible benefit cannot be totally excluded in some of them. When an alimentation per mouth cannot be started during the 8 to 10 days after surgery, an artificial nutritional support becomes mandatory.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты