Journal of forensic nursing · 2025
Retrospective Study on Pain Reports and Treatments at Sexual Assault Medical Forensic Examinations: Clinical Practice Implications.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Miles Leslie W, Valentine Julie L, Hildt Moxley Alyssa, Anderson Cullimore Abby, Wong Bob
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Sexual assault (SA) nurse examiners conduct SA medical forensic examinations (SAMFEs), addressing pain assessment, documentation, and treatment. Limited research exists on patients' pain and related nursing interventions during SAMFEs.
AIM: To evaluate patients' reported pain levels, locations, treatments, and implications for forensic nursing practice.
METHODS: Retrospective chart review (2017-2022) of 5,052 SAMFEs from five Mountain West sites included patients aged 14+, with unrestricted SA kit collection. Descriptive and logistic regression analyses identified predictors of pain reports and treatments.
RESULTS: Pain was reported by 63.1% of patients (mean score: 6/10). Common pain locations were anogenital (41%), abdomen/pelvis (28%), and head (26%). Age, gender, race, injuries, and assailant actions predicted pain reports. Despite documented pain (>4/10), 55.4% received no treatment. Predictors of treatment included age, injury severity, and SAMFE site.
DISCUSSION: SA nurse examiners should conduct thorough pain assessment, documentation, treatment, and reevaluation to improve patient outcomes.
AIM: To evaluate patients' reported pain levels, locations, treatments, and implications for forensic nursing practice.
METHODS: Retrospective chart review (2017-2022) of 5,052 SAMFEs from five Mountain West sites included patients aged 14+, with unrestricted SA kit collection. Descriptive and logistic regression analyses identified predictors of pain reports and treatments.
RESULTS: Pain was reported by 63.1% of patients (mean score: 6/10). Common pain locations were anogenital (41%), abdomen/pelvis (28%), and head (26%). Age, gender, race, injuries, and assailant actions predicted pain reports. Despite documented pain (>4/10), 55.4% received no treatment. Predictors of treatment included age, injury severity, and SAMFE site.
DISCUSSION: SA nurse examiners should conduct thorough pain assessment, documentation, treatment, and reevaluation to improve patient outcomes.