DOI 10.1080/17483107.2026.2683898
Exploring occupational therapists' perceptions of the use of functional electrical stimulation in adult stroke rehabilitation.
Аннотация
Purpose: Stroke is one of the leading global causes of disability, with motor deficits, particularly in the upper limb, being among the most common and debilitating consequences. Occupational therapists are crucial members of the multidisciplinary team, working to enhance patients' participation in daily activities by addressing motor impairments through interventions such as Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES). However, an evidence-practice gap exists in the application of FES. This study aimed to explore occupational therapists' perceptions of using FES in adult stroke rehabilitation in Gauteng, South Africa. Materials and
Methods
This study employed a descriptive qualitative research design. Twelve occupational therapists participated in semi-structured interviews conducted via an online platform. The research population included clinicians working in the neurorehabilitation field in Gauteng, South Africa from both public and private healthcare sectors. An inductive thematic analysis was used to analyse the data.
Results
Three themes emerged from this qualitative study, namely, 'A Tug of War', 'The Lost Leading the Lost' and 'A Puzzle of Practicality'. These themes unravel the perceptions of occupational therapists and explore the factors that influence the use of FES in stroke rehabilitation.
Conclusion
Many identified perceptions and factors challenge the use of FES in adult stroke rehabilitation. Addressing these challenges is essential for improving evidence-based practices in occupational therapy, especially for motor impairments after stroke.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.