Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology · 2016
Second prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients with a high HVPG.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhang Mingyan, Wang Guangchuan, Zhao Lianhui, Wu Zhe, Zhang Wenxing, Zhang Chunqing
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) could be used to stratify patients in different risk groups. No studies have reported the role of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement in a subgroup of patients with a high HVPG (≥20 mmHg) for secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding. This study was designed to evaluate the benefit of TIPS in cirrhotic patients with a high HVPG (≥20 mmHg) for rebleeding and survival.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We included 46 cirrhotic patients with a history of variceal bleeding and a high HVPG (≥20 mmHg) admitted to our hospital between January 2013 and June 2014 (TIPS group). Patients were matched by Child-Pugh scores to patients in our historical cohort hospitalized for prophylaxis of variceal rebleeding between April 2011 and December 2012 (propranolol + EVL group). The end points included time to significant rebleeding from portal hypertensive sources, 1-year survival, and time to the occurrence of hepatic encephalopathy (HE).
RESULTS: The 1-year actuarial probability of remaining free of variceal rebleeding was significantly higher in the TIPS group than in the propranolol + EVL group (85% vs. 54%, p = 0.01). The 1-year survival rates were not different between the two groups (85% vs. 89%, p = 0.591). The 1-year actuarial probability of remaining free of HE was significantly lower in the TIPS group than in the propranolol + EVL group (67% vs. 91%, p = 0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: TIPS was more effective than propranolol + EVL in preventing variceal rebleeding in cirrhotic patients with a high HVPG (≥20 mmHg). During the limited follow-up, survival was similar in the two groups.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We included 46 cirrhotic patients with a history of variceal bleeding and a high HVPG (≥20 mmHg) admitted to our hospital between January 2013 and June 2014 (TIPS group). Patients were matched by Child-Pugh scores to patients in our historical cohort hospitalized for prophylaxis of variceal rebleeding between April 2011 and December 2012 (propranolol + EVL group). The end points included time to significant rebleeding from portal hypertensive sources, 1-year survival, and time to the occurrence of hepatic encephalopathy (HE).
RESULTS: The 1-year actuarial probability of remaining free of variceal rebleeding was significantly higher in the TIPS group than in the propranolol + EVL group (85% vs. 54%, p = 0.01). The 1-year survival rates were not different between the two groups (85% vs. 89%, p = 0.591). The 1-year actuarial probability of remaining free of HE was significantly lower in the TIPS group than in the propranolol + EVL group (67% vs. 91%, p = 0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: TIPS was more effective than propranolol + EVL in preventing variceal rebleeding in cirrhotic patients with a high HVPG (≥20 mmHg). During the limited follow-up, survival was similar in the two groups.