MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00521

Медицинская библиотека · Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2017

EEG Frequency Changes Prior to Making Errors in an Easy Stroop Task.

Atchley Rachel, Klee Daniel, Oken Barry

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Background

Mind-wandering is a form of off-task attention that has been associated with negative affect and rumination. The goal of this study was to assess potential electroencephalographic markers of task-unrelated thought, or mind-wandering state, as related to error rates during a specialized cognitive task. We used EEG to record frontal frequency band activity while participants completed a Stroop task that was modified to induce boredom, task-unrelated thought, and therefore mind-wandering.

Methods

A convenience sample of 27 older adults (50-80 years) completed a computerized Stroop matching task. Half of the Stroop trials were congruent (word/color match), and the other half were incongruent (mismatched). Behavioral data and EEG recordings were assessed. EEG analysis focused on the 1-s epochs prior to stimulus presentation in order to compare trials followed by correct versus incorrect responses.

Results

Participants made errors on 9% of incongruent trials. There were no errors on congruent trials. There was a decrease in alpha and theta band activity during the epochs followed by error responses.

Conclusion

Although replication of these results is necessary, these findings suggest that potential mind-wandering, as evidenced by errors, can be characterized by a decrease in alpha and theta activity compared to on-task, accurate performance periods.

Для цитирования: Atchley Rachel, Klee Daniel, Oken Barry. EEG Frequency Changes Prior to Making Errors in an Easy Stroop Task.. Frontiers in human neuroscience. 2017. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00521.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.