DOI 10.23736/s0021-9509.16.09038-8
Short- and mid-term results after transapical transcatheter aortic valve replacement in nonagenarians.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Recent reports have suggested that advanced age may preclude favorable outcomes in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), particularly when performed via transapical (TA) access. However, detailed examinations of TA-TAVR in nonagenarian patients are lacking in the contemporary literature. We therefore describe our experience with 25 consecutive nonagenarians who underwent TA-TAVR and report their short- and mid-term outcomes.
METHODS
We identified all patients 90 years old or greater who underwent TA-TAVR between 2009-2014 at our institution. Demographic, comorbidity and echocardiographic data were obtained for all patients as were their in-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year outcomes. Overall survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTS
The mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons' predicted risk of mortality was 10.2% (SD±3.4). Twenty-four nonagenarians received TA-TAVR secondary to severe aortic stenosis while 1 had a valve-in-valve procedure for a regurgitant bioprosthetic valve. There were no conversions to open surgery, no aborted procedures, and no in-hospital deaths or strokes; 44% of patients (N.=11) were discharged to home. Five patients required cardiac rehospitalization within the first 30 days and 2 experienced strokes during the first year. Overall 30-day and 1-year survival were 100% and 83%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
TA-TAVR can safely be performed on nonagenarians subjected to otherwise standard selection criteria. Chronology should not stand as a routine contraindication to this procedure; rather, comorbidities and functional status should define patient eligibility for TA-TAVR.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.