MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1586/eem.12.65

Медицинская библиотека · Expert review of endocrinology & metabolism · 2012

Primary aldosteronism: comparison between guidelines of the Japanese and the US Endocrine Society.

Nishikawa Tetsuo, Omura Masao, Saito Jun, Matsuzawa Yoko

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The US and Japanese Endocrine Societies recently both developed a therapeutic guideline for primary aldosteronism (PA). These guidelines indicate that differential diagnosis between PA caused by aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA) and bilateral adrenal hyperplasia (or idiopathic hyperaldosteronism [IHA]) is important and critical for treatment choice, while they show some inconsistency due to different frequencies of disorders and medical circumstances in respective countries. Japanese Endocrine Society guidelines have a unique description on the adrenal vein sampling (AVS) against microAPA, detection of which is difficult with current imaging tools and thus is frequently misdiagnosed as IHA. We reported that AVS performed in combination with adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation was useful for diagnosing laterality of PA lesions, and APA underlay 74% of our cases with significant reduction of IHA compared with those previously reported. Laterality of PA should be precisely evaluated with AVS and imaging studies, as the results strongly influence the choice of therapeutic strategies.

Для цитирования: Nishikawa Tetsuo, Omura Masao, Saito Jun, Matsuzawa Yoko. Primary aldosteronism: comparison between guidelines of the Japanese and the US Endocrine Society.. Expert review of endocrinology & metabolism. 2012. DOI: 10.1586/eem.12.65.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.