Minoxidil, Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP), or Combined Minoxidil and PRP for Androgenetic Alopecia in Men: A Cost-Effectiveness Markov Decision Analysis of Prospective Studies.

Background Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is the most common cause of hair loss in men. In this study, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of minoxidil monotherapy, minoxidil and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) combined therapy, and PRP monotherapy for the long-term treatment of early-onset AGA Hamilton-Norwood stages I-V in men. Methodology Markov modeling was performed to analyze the base-case parameters from 18 level I/II studies. The model base-case assumes a healthy 25-year-old man presenting to a dermatologist or plastic surgeon's office as a new patient for the evaluation and treatment of AGA Hamilton-Norwood stages I-V (non-severe AGA in men). Simulations began at an age of 25 years and ran over 35 years. Analyses were conducted from healthcare and societal perspectives. Outcomes included incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) and net monetary benefits (NMB). Willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds were set at $50,000 and $100,000. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate uncertainty over 10,000 simulations. Results From a healthcare perspective, compared to minoxidil monotherapy, the ICER for minoxidil+PRP was $52,036/quality-adjusted-life-year (QALY) and the ICER for PRP monotherapy was $439,303/QALY. The NMB of minoxidil monotherapy was $914,887, minoxidil+PRP was $914,350, and PRP monotherapy was $904,572 at a WTP threshold of $50,000. When the WTP threshold was increased to $100,000, the NMB of minoxidil+PRP was $1,843,908, minoxidil monotherapy was $1,831,237, and PRP monotherapy was $1,822,246. Societal trends were similar. Conclusions Minoxidil 5% topical twice-daily monotherapy provided cost-effective treatment for men with AGA Hamilton-Norwood stages I-V at a WTP threshold of $50,000, whereas combining minoxidil 5% with PRP provided cost-effective treatment at a WTP threshold of $100,000. Level of evidence: Level II.