Stroke · 2024
Cardiorespiratory Fitness Benefits of High-Intensity Interval Training After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Moncion Kevin, Rodrigues Lynden, De Las Heras Bernat, Noguchi Kenneth S, Wiley Elise, Eng Janice J, MacKay-Lyons Marilyn, Sweet Shane N, Thiel Alexander, Fung Joyce, Stratford Paul, Richardson Julie A, MacDonald Maureen J, Roig Marc, Tang Ada
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Limited evidence supports the effects of short-interval high-intensity interval training (HIIT) for improving cardiorespiratory fitness (V̇O2peak) after stroke. We aimed to compare the effects of 12 weeks of short-interval HIIT versus moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on V̇O2peak, cardiovascular risk factors, and mobility outcomes among individuals ≥6 months poststroke.
METHODS: This study was a multi-site, 12-week randomized controlled trial (NCT03614585) with an 8-week follow-up. Participants were randomized into 3 d/wk of HIIT (10×1 minute 80%-100% heart rate reserve interspersed with 1 minute 30% heart rate reserve [19 minutes]) or MICT (20-30 minutes 40%-60% heart rate reserve). Secondary outcomes of the trial, including V̇O2peak, cardiovascular risk factors (carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, blood pressure, and waist-hip ratio), and mobility (6-minute walk test, 10 m gait speed), were reported. Linear mixed model analyses with a group×study time point interaction evaluated between-group differences.
RESULTS: Of the 305 potential participants, 82 consented (mean [SD] age 64.9 [9.3] years, 32 females [39%], 1.8 [1.2] years poststroke) and were randomized to HIIT (n=42, mean [SD] baseline V̇O2peak 17.3 [5.9] mL/kg·min) or MICT (n=40, mean [SD] baseline V̇O2peak 17.2 [6.0] mL/kg·min). Participants attended 82% of visits (n=2417/2952). No adverse events occurred during the study period. A significant group×study time point interaction was found (χ2=8.46; P=0.015) for V̇O2peak at 12 weeks (mean difference, 1.81 [95% CI, 0.58-3.04]; P=0.004) whereby the HIIT group had greater gains in V̇O2peak (∆3.52 mL/kg·min [95% CI, 2.47-4.57]; P<0.001) compared with the MICT group (∆1.71 mL/kg·min [95% CI, 0.55-2.86]; P=0.001). There was no between-group difference in V̇O2peak (mean difference, 1.08 [95% CI, -0.26 to 2.42]; P=0.11) at 8-week follow-up. No group×study time point interactions were found for cardiovascular risk factors or mobility outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Short-interval HIIT may be an effective alternative to MICT for improving V̇O2peak at 12 weeks postintervention.
REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03614585.
METHODS: This study was a multi-site, 12-week randomized controlled trial (NCT03614585) with an 8-week follow-up. Participants were randomized into 3 d/wk of HIIT (10×1 minute 80%-100% heart rate reserve interspersed with 1 minute 30% heart rate reserve [19 minutes]) or MICT (20-30 minutes 40%-60% heart rate reserve). Secondary outcomes of the trial, including V̇O2peak, cardiovascular risk factors (carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, blood pressure, and waist-hip ratio), and mobility (6-minute walk test, 10 m gait speed), were reported. Linear mixed model analyses with a group×study time point interaction evaluated between-group differences.
RESULTS: Of the 305 potential participants, 82 consented (mean [SD] age 64.9 [9.3] years, 32 females [39%], 1.8 [1.2] years poststroke) and were randomized to HIIT (n=42, mean [SD] baseline V̇O2peak 17.3 [5.9] mL/kg·min) or MICT (n=40, mean [SD] baseline V̇O2peak 17.2 [6.0] mL/kg·min). Participants attended 82% of visits (n=2417/2952). No adverse events occurred during the study period. A significant group×study time point interaction was found (χ2=8.46; P=0.015) for V̇O2peak at 12 weeks (mean difference, 1.81 [95% CI, 0.58-3.04]; P=0.004) whereby the HIIT group had greater gains in V̇O2peak (∆3.52 mL/kg·min [95% CI, 2.47-4.57]; P<0.001) compared with the MICT group (∆1.71 mL/kg·min [95% CI, 0.55-2.86]; P=0.001). There was no between-group difference in V̇O2peak (mean difference, 1.08 [95% CI, -0.26 to 2.42]; P=0.11) at 8-week follow-up. No group×study time point interactions were found for cardiovascular risk factors or mobility outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Short-interval HIIT may be an effective alternative to MICT for improving V̇O2peak at 12 weeks postintervention.
REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03614585.