Annals of surgery · 2020
Diagnostic Accuracy of Point-of-care Tests Used to Detect Arterial Disease in Diabetes: TEsting for Arterial Disease in Diabetes (TrEAD) Study.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Normahani Pasha, Poushpas Sepideh, Alaa Mays, Bravis Vassiliki, Sounderajah Viknesh, Aslam Mohammed, Jaffer Usman
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: We compared the diagnostic performance of a novel point-of-care duplex ultrasound test (podiatry ankle duplex scan; PAD-scan) against commonly used bedside tests for the detection of PAD in diabetes.
BACKGROUND: PAD is a major risk factor for diabetic foot ulceration and amputation. Its diagnosis is fundamental though challenging. Although a variety of bedside tests are available, there is no agreement as to which is the most useful. PAD-scan may be advantageous over current tests as it allows for vessel visualization and more accurate arterial waveform assessment. However, its accuracy has not been previously evaluated.
METHODS: From March to October 2019, we recruited 305 patients from 2 diabetic foot clinics. The diagnostic performance of ankle-brachial pressure index, toe-brachial pressure index, transcutaneous pressure of oxygen, pulse palpation, and ankle waveform assessment using PAD-scan and Doppler devices (audible and visual waveform assessment) were assessed. The reference test was a full lower limb duplex ultrasound.
RESULTS: Based on the reference test, 202 (66.2%) patients had evidence of PAD. PAD-scan had a significantly higher sensitivity [95%, confidence interval (CI) 90%-97%) as compared to all other tests. Particularly low sensitivities were seen with pulse palpation (43%, CI 36%-50%) and transcutaneous pressure of oxygen (31%, CI 24%-38%). PAD-scan had a lower specificity (77%, CI 67%-84%) compared to toe-brachial pressure index (86%, CI 78%-93%; P < 0.001), but not statistically different when compared to all other tests.
CONCLUSIONS: PAD-scan has superior diagnostic utility and is a valid first line investigation.
BACKGROUND: PAD is a major risk factor for diabetic foot ulceration and amputation. Its diagnosis is fundamental though challenging. Although a variety of bedside tests are available, there is no agreement as to which is the most useful. PAD-scan may be advantageous over current tests as it allows for vessel visualization and more accurate arterial waveform assessment. However, its accuracy has not been previously evaluated.
METHODS: From March to October 2019, we recruited 305 patients from 2 diabetic foot clinics. The diagnostic performance of ankle-brachial pressure index, toe-brachial pressure index, transcutaneous pressure of oxygen, pulse palpation, and ankle waveform assessment using PAD-scan and Doppler devices (audible and visual waveform assessment) were assessed. The reference test was a full lower limb duplex ultrasound.
RESULTS: Based on the reference test, 202 (66.2%) patients had evidence of PAD. PAD-scan had a significantly higher sensitivity [95%, confidence interval (CI) 90%-97%) as compared to all other tests. Particularly low sensitivities were seen with pulse palpation (43%, CI 36%-50%) and transcutaneous pressure of oxygen (31%, CI 24%-38%). PAD-scan had a lower specificity (77%, CI 67%-84%) compared to toe-brachial pressure index (86%, CI 78%-93%; P < 0.001), but not statistically different when compared to all other tests.
CONCLUSIONS: PAD-scan has superior diagnostic utility and is a valid first line investigation.