Cureus · 2024
Early Intervention in Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Using an Activator Appliance: A Case Study.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Shinde Mrudula, Daigavane Pallavi, Kamble Ranjit, Kumar Nikhil, Agarwal Nishu
Аннотация
The field of orthodontics has traditionally been regarded as the primary specialty within dentistry. As per Dr. Tweed's recommendation, historical treatment approaches often entailed the extraction of four premolar teeth. Nonetheless, early orthodontic intervention can frequently obviate the necessity for extractions, thus preserving the integrity, functionality, and aesthetic appeal of the dentition. This case report details a non-extraction approach for managing a developing skeletal Class II malocclusion, characterized by a skeletal disharmony between the maxilla and mandible. The chosen treatment option is influenced by factors such as the patient's age, growth potential, the severity of the malocclusion, and the patient's adherence to the prescribed treatment regimen. Myofunctional appliances have been identified as effective in addressing Class II Division 1 malocclusion resulting from mandibular retrusion.