MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s13005-024-00448-8

Медицинская библиотека · Head & face medicine · 2024

Comparison of deep learning models to detect crossbites on 2D intraoral photographs.

Noeldeke Beatrice, Vassis Stratos, Sefidroodi Mohammedreza, Pauwels Ruben, Stoustrup Peter

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

To support dentists with limited experience, this study trained and compared six convolutional neural networks to detect crossbites and classify non-crossbite, frontal, and lateral crossbites using 2D intraoral photographs.

METHODS

Based on 676 photographs from 311 orthodontic patients, six convolutional neural network models were trained and compared to classify (1) non-crossbite vs. crossbite and (2) non-crossbite vs. lateral crossbite vs. frontal crossbite. The trained models comprised DenseNet, EfficientNet, MobileNet, ResNet18, ResNet50, and Xception.

FINDINGS: Among the models, Xception showed the highest accuracy (98.57%) in the test dataset for classifying non-crossbite vs. crossbite images. When additionally distinguishing between lateral and frontal crossbites, average accuracy decreased with the DenseNet architecture achieving the highest accuracy among the models with 91.43% in the test dataset.

CONCLUSIONS

Convolutional neural networks show high potential in processing clinical photographs and detecting crossbites. This study provides initial insights into how deep learning models can be used for orthodontic diagnosis of malocclusions based on intraoral 2D photographs.

Для цитирования: Noeldeke Beatrice, Vassis Stratos, Sefidroodi Mohammedreza, Pauwels Ruben, Stoustrup Peter. Comparison of deep learning models to detect crossbites on 2D intraoral photographs.. Head & face medicine. 2024. DOI: 10.1186/s13005-024-00448-8.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.