MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1098/rspb.1999.0793

Медицинская библиотека · Proceedings. Biological sciences · 1999

A model for the sequential dominance of antigenic variants in African trypanosome infections.

Frank S A

СтатьяПоддержка правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Trypanosoma brucei infects various domestic and wild mammals in equatorial Africa. The parasite's genome contains several hundred alternative and highly diverged surface antigens, of which only a single one is expressed in any cell. Individual cells occasionally change expression of their surface antigen, allowing them to escape immune surveillance. These switches appear to occur in a partly random way, creating a diverse set of antigenic variants. In spite of this diversity, the parasitaemia develops as a series of outbreaks, each outbreak dominated by relatively few antigenic types. Host-specific immunity eventually clears the dominant antigenic types and a new outbreak follows from antigenic types that have apparently been present all along at low frequency. This pattern of sequential dominance by different antigenic types remains unexplained. I use a mathematical model of parasitaemia and host immunity to show that small variations in the rate at which each type switches to other types can explain the observations. My model shows that randomly chosen switch rates do not provide sufficiently ordered parasitaemias to match the observations. Instead, minor modifications of switch rates by natural selection are required to develop a sequence of ordered parasitaemias.

Для цитирования: Frank S A. A model for the sequential dominance of antigenic variants in African trypanosome infections.. Proceedings. Biological sciences. 1999. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0793.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.