The Annals of thoracic surgery · 2008
Intraoperative modified Cox mini-maze procedure for long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cui Yong Qiang, Sun Ling Bo, Li Yan, Xu Chun Lei, Han Jie, Li Hui, Meng Xu
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: As the most effective method of curing atrial fibrillation, the classic Maze III procedure eliminates atrial fibrillation in more than 90% of patients. In spite of high efficacy, the complexity and complications associated with this procedure prevents widespread application. In this research, we report our experience with a modified Cox mini-Maze procedure using radiofrequency energy for treating long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation during open-heart surgery.
METHODS: A total of 45 patients with long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation who underwent open-heart surgery received the treatment. This modified Cox mini-Maze procedure was performed using unipolar and bipolar radiofrequency systems. Some lesions were done with unipolar pen both epicardially and endocardially to improve the transmurality of ablation.
RESULTS: Hospital mortality was 0%. The follow-up time ranged from 6 to 26 months (mean, 16.6). Overall freedom from atrial fibrillation was 86.7% at latest follow-up after surgery. When analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method, freedom from atrial fibrillation was 94% (6 months), 87% (12 months), and 82% (24 months). Compared with a randomized Cox Maze III control group, the results of freedom from atrial fibrillation do not show significant differences between the two groups at interval contacts. The survival rate was 100% (45 of 45), as was freedom from stroke. No patients required implantation of a permanent pacemaker. Recovery of atrial contractility occurred in 94.6% of patients (35 of 37) during the latest follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: According to our experience, the modified Cox mini-Maze procedure allows rapid ablation application and offers an optimistic outcome for the recovery of sinus rhythm in patients with long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation who undergo open-heart surgery.
METHODS: A total of 45 patients with long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation who underwent open-heart surgery received the treatment. This modified Cox mini-Maze procedure was performed using unipolar and bipolar radiofrequency systems. Some lesions were done with unipolar pen both epicardially and endocardially to improve the transmurality of ablation.
RESULTS: Hospital mortality was 0%. The follow-up time ranged from 6 to 26 months (mean, 16.6). Overall freedom from atrial fibrillation was 86.7% at latest follow-up after surgery. When analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method, freedom from atrial fibrillation was 94% (6 months), 87% (12 months), and 82% (24 months). Compared with a randomized Cox Maze III control group, the results of freedom from atrial fibrillation do not show significant differences between the two groups at interval contacts. The survival rate was 100% (45 of 45), as was freedom from stroke. No patients required implantation of a permanent pacemaker. Recovery of atrial contractility occurred in 94.6% of patients (35 of 37) during the latest follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: According to our experience, the modified Cox mini-Maze procedure allows rapid ablation application and offers an optimistic outcome for the recovery of sinus rhythm in patients with long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation who undergo open-heart surgery.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAtrial FibrillationCardiac CatheterizationCardiac Surgical ProceduresCatheter AblationEchocardiography, TransesophagealElectrocardiographyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntraoperative ComplicationsKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedProbabilityReference ValuesRisk AssessmentSeverity of Illness IndexSurvival AnalysisTreatment Outcome