Electroconvulsive therapy related anxiety in patients with depression: The influence of cognitive coping styles.
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION
Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) related anxiety (ERA) is a common phenomenon with high individual variability. The way patients cognitively cope with the prospects of receiving ECT could be a mechanism explaining individual differences in ERA. Cognitive coping like monitoring (information seeking, paying attention to consequences) and blunting (seeking distraction and reassurance) has been linked to anxiety in various medical settings, with monitoring leading to more and blunting to less anxiety. How cognitive coping is related to ERA, is unknown.
METHODS
The sample consisted of 71 patients with unipolar or bipolar depression referred for ECT. Cognitive coping was assessed at baseline, while ERA was measured each morning before the ECT session. Using a Linear Mixed Model, the influence of cognitive coping styles on ERA was investigated.
RESULTS
Blunting was associated with lower levels of ERA (p = 0.037) and monitoring tended to be associated with higher levels of ERA (p = 0.057) throughout the ECT course. Patients with a depression with psychotic features scored significantly higher on monitoring, but even after controlling for monitoring they showed a stronger decline in ERA during treatment compared to patients without psychotic features.
CONCLUSION
Cognitive coping style contributes to individual differences in ERA. Blunting is a protective factor, leading to lower levels of ERA throughout the ECT course. On the contrary, patients with a higher monitoring style tend to experience higher levels of ERA. Further insights in these coping mechanisms may help to tailor future treatment to individual patients and reduce ERA before and during ECT treatment.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.