MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/hed.27369

Медицинская библиотека · Head & neck · 2023

Treatment approaches and outcomes of a head and neck lymphedema service at an Australian comprehensive cancer center.

Venchiarutti Rebecca Louise, Templeton Sandra, Mathers Lara, Charters Emma, Clark Jonathan Robert

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Patients treated for head and neck cancer are at high risk of developing head and neck lymphedema (HNL). We describe outcomes of HNL management at an Australian institution from 2018 to 2020.

METHODS

Electronic records from Chris O'Brien Lifehouse were retrospectively reviewed from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2020. Objective changes in HNL were assessed using The M. D. Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) HNL rating scale and Assessment of Lymphedema of the Head and Neck (ALOHA).

RESULTS

Among the 100 patients referred for management of HNL, surgery was the most frequent treatment modality (80%; 70% with neck dissection) and 69% underwent radiotherapy. Manual lymphatic drainage (MLD) was most often prescribed (96%), followed by self-MLD (93%). Small but significant improvements in ALOHA measurements were observed for 50 patients (50%). Only 5/29 (17%) patients had post-treatment improvements on the MDACC scale.

CONCLUSIONS

Standardized, prospective measurement of treatment approaches and outcomes is needed to further evaluate the service.

Для цитирования: Venchiarutti Rebecca Louise, Templeton Sandra, Mathers Lara, Charters Emma, Clark Jonathan Robert. Treatment approaches and outcomes of a head and neck lymphedema service at an Australian comprehensive cancer center.. Head & neck. 2023. DOI: 10.1002/hed.27369.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.